In the Editor: I do not agree with the guest counsel David J. Bier that immigration, such as many things in the country, must submit to the law of law (“Voters want to carry out immigration, but not like this,” June 5). Before Trump Time, the problem is that responsibly determines immigration policy cannot reach the approval of what is policy and the law. Well, they may be able to do Donald Trump to block the proposed bipartisan immigration law, to survive the issue of 2024 presidential campaigns. Against the backdrop, I refer to the bier not teaching it, for President Trump, the chaos and violence is the point.
Ailin Seely June, Marina del Rey
..
In the editor: The article produces a significant point: Support for border enforcement is unreasonable in severe or harmful policies. Many voters are expected to be more thoughtful, human person, not someone who prevents families or rushes to dispose of the individual circumstances. These methods do not reflect the values of justice and dignity that most Americans still believe.
People say that difficult implementation is about obeying the law, but if no mercy, the law is worse than the intended. Implementing immigration policies should include Smart Case-on-case judged and not punishing for all. A better method balances safely with empathy and recognize that real solutions come from true understanding, not fear.
Patricia Geronimo, Beach in Redondo
