In the development of technology, people also get well to pass through the skills of others
Images / Heritage Heritage images
An analysis of more than 3 million years of Human evolution showed that communication and technology developed in Lockstep. As the ancient people with many advanced stone tools and other technologies, they also improved their communication and teaching skills, to pass their new developmental skills in former generations.
“We have a scenario for evolution in the way of delivering human evolutionary culture,” as Francesco D’Errico at the University of Bordeaux in France. “It appears to be a co-evolution, between the complexity of the cultural nature and complexity of the cultural delivery procedure.”
A different part of people so we develop more complex tools and behaviors. For example, ancient people created sharp rocks available for stabbing and cutting, then attached to wooden sticks to make spear – a technique known to be hafting.
We, we can tell other people how to do these criteria. In most complex cases, such as playing violin or programming a computer, it can be associated with years of teaching and practice. But in the distance we are not good at passing information – especially before the complex language went out.
with Ivan Colagè In the Pontifical University of the Holy Cross in Rome, Italy, D’Errico tracked how our ability to send cultural information in the past 3.3 million behaviors and technologies. Gisubay nila ang 103 nga mga kinaiya sa kultura, lakip ang piho nga mga matang sa himan sa bato, mga dayandayan sama sa mga kuwerdas, mga pigment ug gluary cresibo sama sa mga lubnganan ug pagtukod sa mga lubnganan ug pagtukod sa mga lubnganan ug pagtukod sa mga lubnganan ug pagtukod sa mga lubnganan ug pagtukod sa mga lubnganan ug pagtukod sa mga lubnganan ug pagtukod sa mga lubnganan ug pagtukod sa mga lubnganan ug pagtukod sa mga lubnganan ug pagtukod sa mga lubnganan ug pagtukod sa mga lubnganan ug pagtukod sa mga lubi ug pagtukod sa mga lubnganan ug pagtukod sa Tombs and build graves and build graves and build tombs and build tombs and build coconut and build coconut and build tombs and build tombs and build tombs and build tombs and build tombs and build tombs and build tombs and build tombs and build tombs and build tombs and build tombs and build tombs and build tombs and build tombs and build tombs and build tombs and build tombs. They identified if each character first appeared in regular archaeological records, suggesting it is routine.
The pair is also checked how difficult each character is difficult. Others, like stone hammer, just simple. “You don’t need that explanation,” says D’Errico. However, making more complex tools may need to be displayed, and the most complex behaviors – especially things like burial with a clear religious explanation.
To break it, looked at D’Errico and Colagè THREE PEOPLE TO SEE. First, Spatial: Can you know skill by looking from a distance, or should you close enough? Second, temporal: a short lesson enough, or do you need many sessions, maybe focusing on different steps? And third, social: Who learned from who?
The pair assesses all the characteristics of themselves and also ask a panel of 24 experts for their assessments. They generally agree. “We thought the answers were relatively strong,” said D’Errico.
The new job suggests that there are two major transitions to cultivate culture. First, about 600,000 years ago, the ancient people who are more likely to teach each other, although no need to use spoken instructions: the actions can be enough. That’s good before the beginning of our species, Homo Sapiensand agrees to the emergence of hafting.
Then, between 200,000 and 100,000 years ago, people developed Modern Language. This is necessary because they make criteria such as burial. “It involves a lot of different steps, and you should also mean why you do that,” said D’Errico.
“The link between the culture and culture of culture is strong,” as Ceri Shipton at the University College London. He added that, while there is a lot of uncertainty about when people develop language, the new estimate is “a reasonable timeframe”.
Topics:
