Jonathan Kennedy raises tired specter of “popopoip cownt” advialates to argue that we should be happy that the world’s population can be entered in many billion (Are there billions of people in the world than we think? If so, this is not a bad thing, 31 can).
But as it is recognized that compulsion measures to reduce the population something in the past, he does not mention that, even in these measures voluntarily, to educate the power of women and women. It works because women choose the lowest fertility as soon as possible. However Kennedy ignored the history of Millennia in the empires, churches and military leave they had many children.
He was right that we should not fear the hope of immigrants living many countries, but it is wrong that we need to save them. Fearful fate of low births often spread to Elon’s muscles in the world, with obvious reasons for cheap labor in the population. That they are multiplied by “liberals” outlets show that we lose the lowest fruit of caring for the citizens who do not share women who don’t like them.
In a time deepening the climate change, species of extinction and pollution, and to hitting the world unrestricted, we should not enjoy the people to increase the people who are increased by people who are increased by people who are increased by people who are increased by people who are increasing to our humanitarian and social qualities.
Kirsten Stand
Balance of population
An entire article about overpopulation and no mention of many other species wiped up to set us up. I’m not sure any other animals left alive if the population comes out “at about 10.3 billion in the middle of 2080s”, or if the planet is still home.
Ron Bingham
Muswell Hill, London
Jonathan Kennedy was built in “Bathroom in Alaac Asimov to show the dangers of populistist immigration leaders. He said they would like to keep one’s bathroom, but it was the other risks that were blocked by the poison.” Right. But it is also what it is inevitable to happen if a limited number of baths is shared with frequent increasing numbers, even if the same shared it.
Should be better than sharing resources, but it cannot make unlimited growth on a final planet. There is no “faint” about recognition that the land has limits. In fact, in our population size, we have already broken near seven of nine Critical boundaries on the planet.
It is good to see Kennedy recognized that the activity of the population now focuses on women’s power: right, not to mention that the power of women is important to its own right to its own right to its own right to its own right. So if we can improve the lives and at the same time there are enough “baths” so that everyone is comfortable and avoid disasters, why not?
Small changes in fertility rates have a great impact on future population sizes. While we’re on track for a peak over 10 billion, Unsuming Unsummed Show too that if each woman had another child than the present expected, our global population will groan in 14.4 billion with a boy in 2100. The one is more agreeable to a happy, healthy planet than one.
Olivia Nater
Population connection
Jonathan Kennedy acknowledged that the current concerns about the excess of “climate change, resource losses and a sense of responsibility is not to be able to respond to their effects on the planet. In people today violation of at least six of the nine boundaries on the planetThe Cornucian view is a dangerous one and should be challenged wherever encountered. The excess challenge should be recognized as a major challenge to bring the effects of man in our world within lasting boundaries.
Shane Delphine
Melbourne, Australia
