Give the advocates of Karen supporters of greater letters growing up early demand.
Like, why did Jen McCabe await 2 in the morning searching the internet for information how long is the death of cold? .
How can a person suffer a fatal injury to the head but no broken bones or injuries to his lower body after being hit by a vehicle? (Not unusual for collisions along the sideswipe pedestrian).
How can a human arm get a taillight and suffer scratches? .
Most important, why do feds open an investigation into a pending an investigation to kill state? .
The first attempt never answered all these questions, but it was, with the prosecution case until Second Test Karen read John O’Keefe before 34 Fairview Ave; He can see dead feet from where he dropped him; Types of taillight from the reading vehicle were found in John’s clothing and was set around the crime scene; And John’s DNA was found in the car in reading, near Taillight.
If that is the evidence, it is so much. But there’s more, including computer data from the car showing that after he has fallen in the or’keefe at the time of the car at 75%, before leaving home of O’Keefe.
If this is not enough for you, that’s good. And if these facts do not respond to all questions if the evidence is planted, and if the police behave evil and become over themselves. And if you think of reading reading, I see the argument. It is fair to assume that further efforts will be used to prosecute a defendant’s cop-killer.
What is unfairly teaching the finger of innocent people in the name of the appropriate process. The constitution says a criminal criminal test rights include the right to the exploration of an innocent person by false claims they kill. That is said, this is not the first time that innocent people are accused of being charged because the law of this state was captured by criminals when the lawyers were criminals when guiding principles.
For example, defendants allowed this state to hire experts to lie and the defense can disturb the public to emphasize the lies. This is not a rule that says “Defense can lie” with no significant sanctions when they do.
If the prosecution or one of their experts lie, a judge can prevent evidence and even rejection of cases as punishment (remember Annie DOOKHAN?). This threat of sanctions works as a restraint, but it does not apply to defense.
It doesn’t matter how unfair or even the unethical conduct of defense lawyer, a judge does not prevent the defendant’s evidence or punishment. The Supreme Court of the Jewish peace has made it respectful years ago in a case where a judgment settlement is excluded from evidence because the lawyers violated the rules of discovery.
The highest court courtesy returns decision on the grounds that the rights of the defendants are more important than preventing evil act. The judge in the case of reading, Beverly Cannane, clearly learned when he was recently ruled that evidence helps to read either the defense violated the rules.
So reading can be used each piece of related evidence that can help in his case – but he has a big problem named Hank Brennan. She is a skilled defensive defense lawyer – the service as a fiscal only for this case – and he knows all the tricks. It’s worse for reading, he has so much harming public statements that damage his case and Brennan uses all good.
Defense has some helpful evidence, such as disgusting texts sent to the Trooper of the state in charge of his or her case with a group of his friends. Reading also has the favor of the fact that Brian Higgins, a friend at the ATF agent of O’Keefe, discarded his phone in a skeptical way after reading sexual way over the phone.
But these sequences do not do physical and forensic evidence.
The jury could not stop this case as a straightforward drunk driving hit-and-run homicide. So the real issue is the jurors who see a killer in Karen’s reading.
Most people are uncomfortable thinking that an educated white woman from suburban masachusetts can be a murderer. But if the jury in this case can be taken, Karen’s reading can long to make a mandatory 20 years for the killing of second degree in the second degree. Even the minimum fee is ordered in five.
Anyway reading has a long time behind the reflection bars if the circus is worth.
