Even tourists now claim that our electoral system is toxic. When will the guts work to fix it? | Polly Toynbee

Even tourists now claim that our electoral system is toxic. When will the guts work to fix it? | Polly Toynbee

“GERRYMANDERING! “Shout at the right. But the government’s plan for voting voting, allowing 16- and 17-year-old voters in total elections. Manifesto SaadThe real election reform is no longer in the manifesto. True reform means to eliminate broken, diskless, unreliable and poor first past system.

Keir starter often promises to place the country before party. But as the Social of Social Survey of the Year found, only 12% of people Trust governments to place the country’s interest in their own party. Can prove to labor that they are wrong by healing a weak democracy of severe danger. It requires the moral nerves to admit the system that selects it – allows work to win 64% of the chairs with 34% of bolts. In the words of The society of election reformThe 2024 consequences are “not only the most bad election elections in Britain elections, but one of the most unsteady seen anywhere in the world”.

The next election threat is worse, if a vote below 30% does unwanted winner as five or six parties crushed by a two-party system. Voters know that they need a loud voice: for the first time, 60% of them – including 52% of conservative voters – support the introduction of proportional representation (PR), According to polling In the last month. Election reform can only be their safety.

This seismic transfer of public behaviors prompts some odd transit. Robert Colvile, head of the center for policy studies, the thinking built by Margaret Ithrecher and Keith Joseph, Wrote on time on Sunday: “I often hate pr … about it because the strongest supporters are more different than muesli soldiers without the right opinion of their lives.” But he added: “Cracks … See my implacatable dissures,” before the election reform is something “we need to do.

Meanwhile, at the conservative website at home, the former MP and Tory Grandee Nigel Evans, after many years the reforms of the first post-the-post system, currently warned against “Slept“In” a large majority for a party but not real command “. He calls for a royal commission to review the British voting system.

NIGEL FARAGE TO BE MAINTERS. He always plucked the first post for killing new parties – despite winning 14% election votes last year, the reform of the UK only got five MPs. In the morning after the vote, Blamed Busted: “Our old first past-the-post electoral system is not suitable for the purpose and campaign with anyone and all that changes this election system.”

But in the May Center Elections, reform 32% part of viel REWARDED 41% of council seats for grabs. The Party also retrieves the control of 10 councils. Today who leads the polls, the programming spoken to an “Investic point” where the first past post “becomes your friend”. He considers reform at that point. Hopefully he will keep quiet now on the issue

As for working, its 2022 conference passed a non-binding motion to introduce PR in its first term. Alan Renwick, a professor of UCL in the Constitution unit, warned almost unknown anywhere in the world for personal interest. But times have changed: Work will also recover from trusting a non-party country to prevent rebellious results that have benefited from the last time. Risks ahead has never been. PSephologist and former President Peter Kellner has written many good blogs “The hope of a democratic danger is true”. He is not election reformer – so far.

Changing the voting system to prevent fatty victory such as dirty politics. But here has changed. Kellner’s historic analysis show that the British election always ends the government more than people choose, even if results appear to be contrary. Labor is not loved, but the throw of tourists is the priority shared by most voters. Must be fater to be the Prime Minister, Kellner wrote“For the first time living in life, the country is likely to have the government that people do not like”. reform score first as the party will never support voters.

Faule is the leader that most people want. Starmer is selected by 44% of people if placed against Farage, with the president of the reforms backed by 29%. Despite before the field is useless, he can fill with the Prime Minister with a 29% part of the vote. At this point of crisis, it is an unforgivable dereliction of duty should working failed to move.

A proportional system provides fair seats for equitable votes: no need to know the complex mathematical form of Hondt’s way to verify that. Kellner calls for simplest protection against the most unpopular selection selection, the Alternative Votesthat is not a form of proportional representation but how all parties choose leaders and candidates. Instead of marking an “x” next to their desired candidate, voters rank in order candidates. If no one of them is primarily by 50%, the candidate with the least votes is eliminated and their votes are reassigned according to the second wish stated in ballot papers. The process continues until a candidate receives more than 50% of the vote and, as the smallest hatred, declared winner. May the final election be used this voting system, but not in a landslide. Alternative voting can be introduced quickly and not ask MPs to vote for a system to place the risk of their seats. Political, it fails extremism, because each party is looking for the second preference of the parties.

Kellner will indicate it now in a referendum only after people try it in the next election. Labor has muscle, but will it dare? The 2011 Referendum of Alternative Voting is a fiasco, where dominic cummings cut his brexit teeth with an appealing relief campaign. Certainly the government will surely suffer support for a royal commission consulting commission mainly and reporting for convenience. They should work today, Before our broken system causes a democratic disaster.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *