At least 750 US hospitals faced the breakdowns of last year’s omission, the study was found

At least 750 US hospitals faced the breakdowns of last year’s omission, the study was found

If, one year ago today, a Update Buggy In the software sold by the cybersecity firm confiderstrike that took millions of computers around the world and sent them with changing reboots of all broken history machines. Some of the VARIETY judge Overall damage all over the world rotates billions of dollars.

Now a New study Through a team of medical researchers cybersecuenes the first steps to count the cost of disaster generally not in dollars, but in potential damage to hospitals and their patients in the US. It reveals evidence that hundreds of hospital services have been disturbed during the outage, and increases patients and health concerns.

Researchers from the University of California San Diego today marked the one-year anniversary of Crowdstrike’s catastrophe by releasing a paper in Jama Network Open, a publication of the journal of the American medical Association Network, that attempts for the first time to create a rough estimate of the number of hospitals whose networks Were affected by that it meltdown on July 19, 2024, as well as which services on those networks appeared to have been distracted.

A chart that shows a large spike of found medical services services on the day crashes.

Well fix UCSD and Jara Network Open

By scanning parts exposed to the internet in hospital networks before, and after the crisis, they saw that at a minimum of 759 US hospitals appeared to have experienced network interruptions in some kind of day. They know that more than 200 hospitals seem to hit outages directly affecting patients, from health monitoring scans to health monitoring systems. In 2,232 hospital networks they scan, researchers see 34 percent of them as suffer from certain forms of destruction.

Everyone who indicates most filth can be a “important issue of public health,” arguing Christianity Dameff and a Cybersecity author, and one of the writers of the paper. “If we were in the data on this paper a year ago when it happened,” he added, “I think there’s more to care for the US health.”

Most of the most, a statement sold, strongly criticized Jama’s UCSD study and decision to publish it, calling the paper “junk science.” They noticed that researchers did not determine that the detached networks were running Windows or Crowdstrike software, and pointed out that Microsoft’s main servants on the same day in the Hospital Network. “The conclusions about the development and effect of the patient have not proved to know any of the hospitals discussed completely unresponsive and scientific unstable,” the statement read.

“As we reject the procedure and conclusions of this report, we know the impact of the incident in a year ago,” The statement increases. “As we say from the beginning, we sincerely apologize to our customers and those who are affected and continue to focus on strengthening our platform and industry.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *