We keep going to an incoming hotter we can’t do normal. To pass, there is a high risk of triggering “tipping points” to make climate trouble worse. Due to our failure to cut carbon emissions, geengineering appeal to cool the planet is growing – but is this the right thing to do?
As we reported to “GeenGineering can avoid climate tipping points, but not when we long”Some researchers come up with the idea that pumps aerosols to withdraw aerosolds that can stop tapping points such as shutdown to the loud currents in the oceans. But geoesineering hazards are large.
For those who begin, there is no hope of getting it as soon as international, but if a country alone, things can be bad, shifting rain around the world, for example. And if a country feels it is damaged by geemengineering with others, we can end up with a climate war where geengineering is used.
Even if there is a deal, things are not far from straight. Finished error, geoehineering can make worse, not better. There is a smaller model of computer modeling and testing the real world of any geegineering ideas for us to have confidence that they will groan as intended.
We can end in a climate war where geengineering is used as a weapon
The matter is, the clock is set. As soon as we can start geengineering, the chance of avoiding hazardous points of tipping. This is an option we need to check.
However, many scientists are opposed despite geeoengineering research. A fear is that it is to be used as an excuse to disrupt the carbon dioxide emissions. Nevertheless the argument is not so stressful in a world where US Donald Trump president is to restore climate action without causing any kind (see “What happens to the climate from the ‘great lovely law of Trump?”).
GeenGineering can be a terrible idea – but we don’t know that unless we make more research. Time to do now, before we are forced to take a good action without a strong science to guide us.
Topics:
