Your article (Millions of tons of tons of swagage swagage spreads to the UK farm every year, 7 July) Provides some insight to the impact of environmental practice and regulatory control. The legal case is made until 2015 that the spread of the swage sludge – which is preferred by the water industry applicable to various industrial can applies for the benefit of agriculture. It is not surprising that reference to the swage sludge is treated as a “garbage” that has gained strong resistance from the water companies fearing the market collapse.
However this is just a part of the story. The inhibition of seawater, which is linked to the landfill, sees a large transfer from wasting an area more than the field farm. In addition to the curse, there are garbage waste, waste composting and anaerobic digesteate, plus a variety of garbage repairs deposited. Examples such as carcasses of pigs to compost Farmland confirm what to try some people to avoid unaccountable regulates.
While there are good examples of use of garbage treatment to improve the land, the cumulative burden of the environment in the geniuses of profits are never checked and unknown.
John Galvin
Previous policy counselor, agency around and defra
There is a £ 6m research project LEARNING USING PYROLYSIS IN SWAGYSIS SWAGE SUPPLIED TO SUCCESS IN THE EARTH EARTH and may reduce pollutants such as PFAs – called “chemicals” “chemicals”. The project made by Thames Water, Twwat and other companions aimed at the delivery of an ongoing flow system to be widely deployed, and the research due to the completion of 2027.
If successful, this technology will allow our curse to use as an agricultural input while meeting our greater release of pollution and climate release. However, we need to further invest in our water treatment system. Can the challenge fulfill privatized water in water?
Andrew Wood
Oxford
