Editor letters: Utility companies must respond to residents, not shareholders

Editor letters: Utility companies must respond to residents, not shareholders

In the editor: The article of workman Melody Petersen’s article is a good start to the failure of profits to take public public, but it is not much enough (“Edison’s safety record refused last year. Executive bonuses also,” May 18).

In a first arrival, the amount of dollar damage made by my Altadena community is in par with the market capital in the Southern California Edison market. The penalty for a failure of this scale should be the death of for-profit corporation.

In the financial, financial incentives for leadership of a for profit corporation often develops motivated government safety costs. It doesn’t matter that adjustment compensation adjustments will solve it. The goods must respond to voters, not shareholders.

The Legislature to convert to Edison to Socal and PG & E of the Municipal Brains. They need to require the actions of moving transmission lines from dry plants or bury them. The future, dry and air is warm. We need our power tools to get to get it serious.

Sue Greer, Altadena

..

In the editor: Gee, nice job when you get it. A question: Why did the executives of SoCal Edison have a bonus in any year? And what did the chief executive Posarro do, every day, to justify his loose salary?

Jack Grimshaw, Lake Forest

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *