In 1983, thousands of other women were with me, I cut sections of the fence around RAF Greenham often, which were nuclear weapons of cruise nucles.Greenham women urged new generation to ‘rise’ against nuclear threat, 27 in July).
Caught and fined £ 50 for criminal injury, I was jailed for a week due to refusing to pay the fine. After the 1984 missiles, I joined the actions of Colherowwatch, which, by blocking the road convoys and throwing paints in their missile deployments held secretly. Again the excuses are not extreme. Sucked by Salisbury Plain on an occasion, my friends and I have been released free. Women who do more than £ 10,000 worth of damage to blackbird spy plane in 1983 also their charges fall.
This week, if Secretary Secretary, Yvette Cooper, have his way, those who do similar criminal injuries can face 14 years in prison because of “terrorism” (Free Target Target or Terrorist Gang? The inside of the Palestine Action content – and its ban on its ban, 28 June). However the unstable civil disobedience works. In 2004, Mikhail Gorbachev said he attended 1986 Reykjavik Summit because he was confident “Greenham’s actions in Europe (…) America is not allowed to take advantage if we bring this step“That step carries a 1987 agreement to remove tactical nuclear weapons, including cruise missiles, from Europe.
Keir Starmer plans once more to design tactical nuclear nuclear weapons, under the control of the US government, in British land and The mass protests are already planned. As the guardian taught the excellent editorial of movement in Palestine (23 June), Starmmer may think that “the revisiting appears to be corrupt as a National Security Heatat is a way to have a public anger”, but it can’t be lost.
In contrast, Margaret’s government Argaret shows that increasingly supporting “eccentric” women can increase popular support. Maybe he can learn something.
Dryne Jones
Mousehole, Cornwall
My daughter was imprisoned waiting for the test related to the direct action against a company owned by Israel in the summer of Palestine’s action. I was reeling the news that Yvette Cooper Planning to add a terrorist list. This is the hypocrisy of the highest order. My daughter went along with Palestine because he saw his government breaking the international law of human law, and he saw that all the marches he attended and the petitions that he signed were ignored.
If the movement of Palestine criminals, so are all the people who give support without bringing direct action to themselves. Palestine’s action volunteers gave my daughter valuable emotional and practical support. They visited her in prison, talking to her on the phone, write her letters and send her money and book. Do they force to stop, or face prison?
People conscience are not terrorists or criminals. That label belongs to a government fleeting in regimes, commits crimes against mankind, and crushes anyone in the home that is against illegal acts. I think the wrong people are imprisoned.
Name and address provided
I sincerely agree with Juliet Stevenson’s article (The action of moving Palestine spraying paint is not terrorism. As ministers abuse their powers, I feel a duty to speak, 30 June). I wonder if Yvette Cooper is where he is now without the most serious infruRagetes actions.
Claire Jauffret
Wimbledon, London
Sally Rooney’s Brilty’s Brilliant Action in Palestine Appropriate Width Support (Israel kills innocent Palestinians. Spray-paint activists are a plane. Guess where the UK government calls terrorism, 22 June). If you actually become a prosecribe organization, I ask people who praising non-violent protests to express their approval group at a time. Let the police catch us all, send us the test. If we believe in freedom of saying, the least we can do is restoring ourselves in the possibility of imprisonment for that difficulty correctly.
It is our right to express approval of non-violent direct action against cooperation with those who commit crimes in war. If courts and prisons have been clogged and overflowing as a result, the government will soon get the message that does not lack the reasonable objection.
Rev Graham Murphy
Liverpool
