UNeasy is located in the head wearing the BBC crown. Tim DavieThe Belumuered Director General (DG), must be checked in the mirror to see if he is still wearing and afraid of the phone call to call him a urgent word.
Many BBC leaders are caused by their sword, usually as a result of hostility from political leaders and a media furore. The stress is generally believed to cause Ian texlowan (1977-82) to have a heart attack. His successor, Alexander Milne (1982-87) Greg Dyke . Gavyn Daviesaccompanied him). And in 2012 George Entwisth lasted only a few weeks of the building before he was ruthlessly tortured today John Humphrys Over coverage of the News Night in a scandal of child abuse, then left the building.
And the past can come back to frighten you. The successor to entwistista, Tonyo Hall (2013-20), has been No stop chasing by Earl Spencer On the strange talk with the BBC of his brother Diana, princess of Wales, who occurred when the news director of the news. Another installation is promised in autumn, if a book declares a cover-up of the BBC print.
Davie’s tenure (2020-?) Is in balance because of BBC The occupation of an act of who is DG, with most of us, may not be heard.
Disgusting insurgents, the violent threat of Israel’s defense force can be a good career step for Rap Duo Bob Vylan, even if the US only banned Davie.
No doubt that the BBC makes serious mistakes on it Bob Vylan coverage and that DG, who attended Glastonbury and consulted for his view of how to proceed immediately after the offensive chanting, personally engaged. He decided to allow living events at that stage while making sure no recordings were available, although it was allowed viewers to scroll back and see offensive material. Many questions remain. Did the BBC have a hard work on Bob Vylan – that is, examine their history of political political statements? Why didn’t they cut the living feed on group performance? Why is the scope then left for five hours in iPlayer?
If DG is not yet on a fixed field, he will no doubt command an urgent investigation that may result in disciplinary action. But he could hardly discipline himself apart, of course, by resignation.
I guess he doesn’t have to do it. In three reasons: First, he has, in many ways, a good good director generally should conduct a large reduction in corporate income (around 30% in real terms Since 2010) for a period before since competition, and start moving BBC in the digital world.
When viewed as a trader, he is unreliable famous and can command higher financial rewards elsewhere. An excellent person, he assured that the BBC still made famous programs and arranged around the world at a time of important financial for the corporation.
Second, the BBC was covered with an enthusiastic propaganda war about coverage in the Middle East and Gaza specifically. The attempt to report fairly and authority has been prevented from the government’s refusal to allow independent publishers in Gaza Strip. The corporation has been institutionally antisemoling and / or islamophobic, and is called media monitoring groups on both sides without mercy at a time. This – it – there are mistakes, but we still need independents and always good journalism at a time of party reporting and social language. The corporation should also cope with competitors such as Telegraph, the mail, GB News and Talks, whose commercial part success depends on BBC’s reduction.
The third reason Davie should stay that, now, he is central to BBC safety. License fees, service world service and public service general is in general threat. Useless heir to take the poison chalice on BBC.
But Davie needs to change. Even if he lives and breaths BBC 24/7, he tried to do much of himself. She needs to teach a Deputy DG that is a real-time reporter and flak catcher, with a suitable suspicious mind. Davie is not a reviewer or a program maker and no sixteen definition, an antenna for trouble, which is one of his previous journalists and editors Mark ThompsonThere is a lot.
The worst thing that can happen among the offense from the Fallout of Glastonbury is that the BBC pulls out of reporting the Tragedies in the Middle East. I believe the opposite should happen. Davie’s commission programs have to explore the history of Zionism and Palestinians. I did not see or heard any programming testimony of the detail, or exploring the difference between Anti-Israel and a difference that the government’s supporters were intentional.
It is ironic that some of the best conflict reports come from Israel’s reporters working within Israel, many for the newspaper haremetz. Bloody but don’t work, the BBC needs to imitate it, with Tim Davie still in its head.
