PHides the tower by setting us up each other. It is not more real than the countryside, where the effects of a severe concentration of ownership and control are blamed for those who have nothing to do with it. The people of the rural arder of no end taught that they did not oppress the Lords on earth, but through the fierce and ignorant cities – the “jackboot city“As the alliance of the countryside is used to call it – tapping their traditions.
Near the Dorset bridport today, a whole village faced eviction, following Brideade-Estate Sales for about £ 30m. The official new owner, Bridehead Estate Ltdregistered with the same address, with similar officers, as a company is called Belport. the Telegraph Reports That land “Belport bought, a private reason company, for a rich client of the previous autumn”, but no one knows who the client is. So far I’ve never received the questions I sent to Belport.
The people of Glathbredy, a village of 32 homes, fully owned by landsaid they were ordered to leave from January. At the beginning of this month, access to parts of the 800-acre (2,000-acre) yard, widely enjoyed by local people, ENDSOTHERS Red signs with this effect and padlocks to all entries. Didn’t know who did it with them. The feeling of powerlessness is greater.
A person has been driven out, to make a way for an office of land. When he complained about his social media treatment, The first answer saying, without an incident of evidence: that is how divisions and rule: do not think the unidentified plutocrat that turns him away, the real reasons, however, the seekers of asylum.
Right parties and the right media are covered about the need for “consolidation”. But that word is used as a weapon against immigrants. They are not the ones who have laid the communities, tore people from their homes and prevent us from the ground, which causes social destruction. This is the power of money.
But look, a spider! The city of the cosmopolitan, which sweeps immigrants and people trans, come to get you! it End traditions People who love people and impose one’s own culture rather. It droted on our heads people want people different from oppressive urbanisids like urbanes. But it’s not true.
Shame for people who claim to own counselors, some of the evidence from their own reviews. Incoming countryside – telling us this “powered by the countryside Foundation Foundation“, The charitable arm of the Countryside Alliance – commissioned polling in 2023. Its question about a wider right to roam in the countryside was phrased in a way that made it sound threatening:” To what extent do you agree that the public should be the ‘meaning that anyone can wander Countryside Regardless of Whether the Land is Privately or Publicly owned? ” However, there is no difference between the answers to people in urban and countryside: 55% of the rural people “have only been owned by conservaties, if only 3% of the conocnatizs, while only 3% of the conocnizs, while only 3% of conservatizs, If only 3% are primarily conservatives, while only 3% of conservatizs, if only 3% of politics, if only 3% of society, only 3% of the conocnies, if the people of the ancestors, if the people of politics, if the people of politics, if 9% of conservatives asked?
Probably unchanged, these answers fail to find future public display of consequences. However, only mentioning a right to roure a comment from an anonymous rural respondent: links to both raw Polls data and public presentation On the organization’s website now shows a “404 error” when you try to open it.
Unique, writing a year after the results were published, the chief executive of Layer Caniance, Tim Bonner, claiming that a wider right to roam is “Completely contradictory In what public likes “. With admirable Chutzpah, he accused of callers in a” cultural war in the countryside “.
When Yougov The question is framed to the question, for a poll ordered by the right to roam the campaign, found 68% of the towns of town and 68% of the people in the city support it. it also discoveredto more than the contrary to the claims of some rural “Guardia” calling it “The social glue that keeps rural communities “, that opposing dog hunting is strong everywhere: 78% of people in town and 74% of rural people against it. As access campanisediende Tucked by Jon Moses In an article for lead, “the issues where we are told that most of us always have the issues where we are truly agreed”.
The view is supported by some Interesting research Published in election journal, public opinion and parties. Knowing that while in many countries in the West there is a political division between cities and rural, it is not available in Britain. “We do not find any evidence that British is more angry, dissatisfied or ‘left behind’ as compared to their city counterparts.” In cultural issues, found, “Ruralites are often less – not more – authoritarian than urbanites … and not to support an undermoulricor leader”.
We usually have the same people, despite the best efforts to cultural warriors we divide. But we should be persuaded that other people don’t like what we want: that we are outsiders, shrubs, the odd minority, pushing against social right now.
In fact, the odd minority is 1% self-contained half of all land In England, and the subset of that group that hides their owner Behind the companies in front of opaque trusts. If the government Suggested changes In advance of the land register, it may be easy to identify real owners like the bride, though I suspect we are still fighting.
On 5 July, the right to tour the campaign to organize a peaceful breach In the bride, to attract attention to almost feudal powers that changes the mountain life. The real conflict is not the country of town, but money and power v are people. Holding, no matter what you live. Don’t let the strong people tell you who you are.
George Monbiot is a columnist in Guardian
On Tuesday 16 September, George Monbiot, Mikaeela Loach and other special guests discussed the force of climate launch, living in Barbican in London and live in the world. Book tickets HERE or to Guardian.live
