Federal Supreme Federal Porte in UAE has a previous judgment of high-profile terrorism case and issuance of terrorist terrorist sentences.
The court sentenced the defendants in life imprisonment fOr cooperating with “terrorist justice and dignity organization,” and provide funds to “Al-Islah Terrorist Organization,”, plus the order of seizing all funds and items covered by these crimes.
The Attorney General, Chancellor Dr. Hamad Saif Al Shamsi, appealed to the decision of the crossroads of the Crucifixion Krux on the Cross of the Cross
UAE courts
The lawyer general argues that the rule is legal error in applying it to the law, and therefore should be extinguished.
He emphasized to apply to court the sanctions prescribed for more severe finances and dealings with any part of the penalty served under previous judgment.
The court’s decision to dispose of criminal case for both sins based on a final judgment released in case No. 79 of State Security Crimes – State Crimes – State Crimes Lost – State Crimes – Lost State Crimes – Lost Crimes in State – Lost Crimes of State – State Crimes – Lost Crimes of State – Lost Crimes of State – Lost Crimes of State – Lost Crimes in State – Lost Crimes of State – Crimes Lost Crimes
the Before judgment The accused of a crime has only been convicted, which is the establishment of “al-Islah in Central Code No. 1 in 2004 in Center Code No. 1 in 2004 Code No. 1 in 2004 In centive code No. 1 in 2004 at the Conferral Code No. 1 in 2004 in CentiFating Law No. 1 in 2004 in Center Code No. 1 in 2004 in the Confereral Code. 1 in 2004 in the Confereral Code. 1 in 2004 in the Confereral Code.
The lawyer’s federal supreme is investigating the appeal of the general, and its session last Thursday, June 26, which is declared to divide the judgment.
The court based the decision of the clear legal difference between incidents of both cases, which are invalid any claim that they have the same cause or subject.
Each event consists of an independent criminal act that occupies one’s own penalty under the law.
Accordingly, the previous rule of the case No. 79 of State Security Crimes – do not bring legal weight to prevent prosecution to defendants in case of defency and collaboration in current case.
Since challenging judgment does not cover this principle and dismisses the criminal case based on the first judgment, despite the difference between the cause and subject, judgment wandered into its application.
It requires partial disruption to specific charges, limited by the accused named appeal to the Attorney General.
The Security Security of the ABU Dhabi Federal Court of Appeal has previously arrived, in the case of 2023 leaders of leaders who leaders leaders “in addition to six companies.
Sentences from life and temporary imprisonment of fine worth AED20M ($ 5.4m), while an accused is released.
After the reign of Thursday at the State Security Chamber of the Federal Supreme Court, the total number of convicted individuals in this case has risen 83 in 84 mentioned in the test.
