I am a former principal constable, and once attempts to be a labor at work and crime commissioner. Therefore I am not a person who is easily categorized as a supporter of terrorism or criminal activity. The decision to enhance Palestine movement as a terrorist group without satire (Report, 20 June). I suspect the shame of silent security failures on a RAF based basis can prevent judgment and good behavior.
Progress in a group for peaceful protests – however illegal – a disgrace. It’s almost shameful like the continued support of the UK for apartheid, cleaning ethnic cleansing of Israeli. If home secretary would like to prosecribe an organization, why not proscribe terrorism group known to be speech Forces for defense? They killed innocent people every day, and even though I have been charged – for the government is useless.
Words mean nothing. Israel’s leadership does not pay attention to them, though our government continues to armar it. The proposal to prosecribe Palestine Action is not a member and, straightforward, disgraceful. This is an abuse of an important law – one here used to prevent support for Palestinians. The secretary of the house appears to be the rest of the back.
Medyddd Hughes
Bradwell, Derbyshire
The plan to enhance the action of Palestine action is to take advantage of this government to communicate with all the actions of Israel in Gaza and the West Bank of actions. The protest group explained that their reason to use spray paint on both planes is to focus on public support of Israel’s actions.
That logistical support has taken many forms, and the public is only known for some. At the same time, the government often condemns Israel’s genocidal policies. It should not be surprised if its support for Israel leads to alarming reactions. I recently joined a large, friendly and peaceful march of London support of Palestinian impression. I hope that home secretary will think of British history to allow protests in his future policies.
Simon Barber
Uttoxeter, Staffordshire
The government responds to some people who sprayed paint and broke windows by expressing them “terrorists”. If that is terrorism, then the word loses all the meaning. The ban on them – and their supporters – can be reasonable if they have, or sponsor, an assassination campaign and / or body harm. But unless the government can prohat the last, then the subscription to a group that protests against a war is worse, and sets a dangerous pricle.
Anti-Frackers terrorists? Hunt Sabotes? Even last year rioters are not called terrorists, though they caused the disem in many towns and towns. No one is safe if the proscription can be behaved.
Pedrol Loschi
Chadderton, Great Manchester
So now is a terrorist if you protest against the government that supports genocidal acting in innocent people? Ang usa ka gamay nga buhat sa panamastamas dili lisud nga paghuyop sa mga tawo, apan kini nga gobyerno nagsuporta sa pagpatay sa Gaza sa tanan namon nga mga ngalan o isulat kung pila ang among mga ngalan o isulat kung pila ang among mga ngalan o isulat sa among mga MPS. Infrura terrorists with terrorists when we use this criterion. I am not a member of Palestine Action, but they sound like my kinds of people.
Mary Gildea
Charlton, London
