I spend most of my academic life in Cambridge who tries to understand money and capitalism, especially in many ways in the financial methods of making financial ways of doing things and economic services.
Rachel Reeves’s proposed deregulation will definitely disturb the problem, because Larry Elliott makes it clear (Rachel Reeves hopes that deregulation can save the economy. We know how to end, July 16). He followed a long tradition of the Thaldom Labor in the city, from Philip Snowden in 1920 in Gordon Brown and Ed Balls balls. Harold Wilson only understands the problem – many people are getting stronger and not enough to do economic activities and die in the town and the Treasury and Banks in England Insies.
Of course, Keir Starmer and Reeves will face similarly strong obstacles when they have nouss to start making financial reform and administrative economic development, but they are not. What are the properties, flabbergasts and I am saddened are their economic and historical ignorance, and complete lack of sight and imagination. This is funnier for a labor government to think that economic growth is encouraged by increased revelation of lighted regulated city.
Geoffrey Ingham
Political economic professor of political, university of Cambridge
Heather Stewart article makes the case for good policy policy study (Why work should target happiness with economic growth, 13 July) In contrast to Chancellor plans for city deregulation, which has enraged some endless mental center of government.
After the final financial crisis, we saw famous economists Joseph Stiglitz, Amartya Sen and Jean-Paul Fitoussi Create a conclusion case for governments to complete GDP data with better social progress measures. In their words: “The benefit is important because there is an increasing gap between information containing GDP data and what is the benefit of people.”
Rachel Reeves reforms may or may not inspire growth, but their success should not be checked on a scale. However, all government policy should be checked against if it develops lives for citizens, especially those with less.
Adam lang
Director of Policy, Insight and Adbokasiya, Carnegie UK
The Rachel Reeves sets himself as “George Osborne Lite”, bowing down the city regardless of people who voted to work. Simultaneously he has two many problems with the UK tax system. Business rates and council taxes both dysfunctional, specified decades have passed when financially operated.
Business rates are based on rental value and no notice of profits made from retail warehouses such as Amazon. Council tax Based on the bands worth specified in years ago and only targeted it. The owner of a multimillion-pounds mansion pays the same as a house four-bedroom at the center of London. When can we see these problems set?
Jem Moore
Bath
