WHat is the main lesson we take from Jane Austen? I know the novels are not manuals, but Austny urges a way of helping its own products – and itself is filled with what we don’t call bossy opinions. From books, there are endless judgments about how to become a female substance. From screen adaptations, we know how nice you have a Big House in Derbyshire. There is a total rule of true love to overcome all obstacles. But there is also this: without a bad fate to happen to a woman than not failing to lock someone.
Two new anticipates are on our way: a netflix ministry of Pride and prejudiceand a new one Sense and Sensibor movie version. They are well together, Lena Dunham’s new Show that riffs in our romcoms relationship – how we use them as templates and values – a clear removal of Seattle, except Lee’s definition and thinking as its urtext than An agreement to remember.
In Dunham’s Show, Jessica, played by Megan Stalter, sitting in his family that relatives Alan Rickman, who experienced stress in the 1995 tension experiences found in the tension of Austen. This is a meta-treated genre, while two future adaptation are typical pieces of time; But while these projects vary, what remains surprised, over 200 years after Austen writes, so that causal thinking remains the same as a woman than a woman.
Before I go further, I have to say that, every unused Constitution of Britain – who rules holding all citizens – there are opinions of all adaptations with only the right opinions. For example, it should not be said that Gwyneth Paltrow is awesome like Emma in 1996 movie, and also we have that matching Miss Bates in Sophie Thompson (in the scene where She is insulted at the Box Hill).
Romcom is also true, especially the austen adaptation, which hits you is different if you are more interested in Jennifer Hle than Colin Firth. There are no gays in Austen, obviously – even though Mr Bingley is the relatively little gentleman and the half of the women who do not cause goals of goals, you see things that are different things. That we stayed in this model of marriage as the promise that a woman has done for good drama and who doesn’t love a love story? But at risk that the fiery lesbian of the feast, the lips, several centuries – the long-term conjunction to the back end we never talk about.
Who brings me to another TV show, one checking, in the bright, scary details of ROMCOM claims. Peke is a drama in Australia based on Stephanie Wood’s 2017 Viral Pieces In Sydney Morning Herald that he becomes a better memoirAnd where the birdie bell, her re-changing ego, loves Joe, a man he has met with an online dating site. The wood / bell dates him for more than a year, which time he presented himself as a good businessman and developer of property. Later, and after a series of tragic tricks, Joe was revealed as a lied grifter living under a tarpaulin in a stream. And here is the point: The reason that the hero ignores the red flags because he is 49 and in his life, that he has a defect until he is married.
I’m not a straight girl but I find myself indicating birdie and, through him, stephanie wood, especially uncomfortable marriage. In case of wood, experience is a felt like shit as a single straight woman without children; And for me and every gay man I know, there are memories of all the weddings we went to the 1990s and in the first things that have not been lived as an event from an event that we did not change. (Marriage, consisting of hundreds of rights, financial privileges, benefits, legal for equal-sex sex In 2014 in England and Wales, and one year later legalized the US in the Supreme Court.) Not very romantic, huh.
None of this is the mistake of Austen, or Dunham’s, and I will surely say that Dunham’s engagement of Romcom History is shot at a sensibon I call gay-links. .
Then, as far, that message is rooted under different value system, one that balances a woman’s worth if she has children or married. But as we look forward to a bunch of many products driven by the alternatives to the alternate, it is worth noting the flipside to insult that every good story ends with a wedding. In the case of wood, the more cheating he was not carried by a conman, but, because of the excess pressure on him to go to someone who was saying, being away from himself to fall for him.
