Threats were taken to cut the federal fund following anti-Semitic, Anti-Israel and Pro-Palestinian shows to follow “Veritas,” or Truth.
the Wall Street Journal Reports that university leaders discuss when making a center for conservative scholarship. It is the mirror of the Hover institution at California’s Stanford University. That discussion is a tacit admission that is excluded from the conservative mind from its curriculum, not discussing most of the students in the line of doing the same.
Like other old League schools in Ivy, Harvard used to have a religious and conservative foundation. Constructed by the puritans of 1636Harvard has its roots in Puritan World Vay in life. Its stated purpose is to train ministers and prepare students for community and Civic leadership. In the mid-18th century, Harvard has been developed in a more secular institution, which extends its curriculum to include a more liberal education of the arts and establishing a survey branch. While it has a school of holiness, it is also liberal in theology and more agreeable to a liberal political agenda.
When he was president of Harvard (1953-1971), Nathan Pusey Said: “The best fruit of serious learning should be the ability to speak the word god without reserve or shame.” It was given what we saw in recent months of their and other campuses to show that God became a shame, unless his name was used as blasphemy.
The idea that there should be a separate institution to “study” conservatism is a factor of some conservatives. Seemed to be a form of “separate but equal.” Do conservatives consider a rare Harvard species that their way of thinking should be studied to understand? Is this a form of life from another planet to be able to take others if unstoppable from “normal” people? Should students studying conservatism should wear anonymity badges or arms to distinguish it with liberal and liberal professors to avoid possible “contamination”? Will this new branch of studies with a conservative starting start instead of the continued stream of Liberal speakers at the end?
In many years there are many conservative intellectuals shown in ideas and policies that are more positive results than secular liberalism. Such thoughts and histories should be included in the main learning and not put on “Back on bus.”
One of the primary conservative conservatives in the 20th century is the last William F. Buckley Jr. “The book” Gobly Her the first 2,000 people in Harvard the first 2,000 people in Harvard the first 2,000 people in Harvard “think about what he has now given the university in recent months.
It is better to have a place where conservative thought can be studied and students exposed to a different way of thinking than the Liberal taught. That would give conservative thought and conservative thinkers the recognition they deserve, along with examination of why conservative economic, social and foreign policy ideas have produced mostly better results than secular liberalism.
Readers can email Cal Thomas to [email protected]. Find the latest cal Thomas’ book a nightdown: What I see in more than 50 years reporting America “(HumanixBooks).
