The ‘Science Fair’ lost protests in Trump cut
A protest in a congessional office building promoting future research findings that many science cuts will be omitted
Capitol Hill, Washington DC | Some dozen scientists protested in canceling their US government research on a ‘Science Fair’s Comersions in a House House House House House House of Representatives Science Committee, Mao the newest in opposition to actions Taken by the Republican Donald Trump administration to tackle the spending of science.
Researchers show posters how their abits of projects can benefit from society. They are more angry with how lost funds of young scientists have been on the end of their own projects. “If you’re currently training as an undergraduate or PhD, do you want to go to a community with no funds?” Ruben Harris, a biochemist at the University of Texas Health Science Center in San Antonio, speaks Nature.
Since Trump took office in January, the US National Institute of Health, World’s largest funds in the worldended about 2,900 research levels, according to The Database Grant Watch – Even if these 900s can be reclaimed after A federal judge ruled they canceled without proper reason. The US National Science Foundation (NSF), is another Powerhouse in the US, canceled over 1,600 grants. Cutters focuses on research programs that survived the Trump team, including investigators in the health minorities, Biology underlying Covid-19 and the spread of misinformation. They also refer to some universities, like HarvardIn Cambridge, Massachusetts, the administration says that their students are not protected from antisemontism.
In support of science journalism
If you enjoy this article, think about supporting our winning journalism in Subscribe. By purchasing a subscription you helped to ensure the future of influential stories about the discoveries and ideas that make our world today.
The Democrats in the Committee designed the movement, titled ‘the things we could not find out: a science justifiable from public cuts and other policies. “What about politics in the fight for science is that people are hard to tell what’s missing before it.” So it’s shown a little sample of what people are in the science. “
Missing results
Many of scientists presented the movement a few years of their projects before their fund was cut – the waste of money spent. Julie Cidell, a Geographic Information Scientist at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, was about Halfway through her study on how switching to electric-freight vehicles from diesel ones might benefit local communities when the US environmental protection agency cancelled her grant. “We would like to gather air quality data from individuals – there are people around their neighborhoods with a variety of vehicles (EVs), as we can do no more because we don’t have funds to pay for people.”
Katie Shilton, an artificial intelligence (AI) researcher of the University of Maryland at College Park, and his team established social-networking platforms such as discords in social-networking and next. He has already spent four years working with online communities to develop AI items when the NSF has been deleted. “We’ve built this tool. We started it,” Shilton said. “We need to reject our student coding the tool. Our graduated students have lost summer funds. And we cannot conclude.”
Along with the rest of the fair, Jessica Rosenbermg, an astrophysicist who studied science, technology, Virginias (stem) education in Jolge Mon University in functions that George art in junior scientists. Rosenberg is in the process of hiring team members to study students education techniques regarding the amount of NSF news. Three postdoctoral students “just finished signing in that their other offers and have to start in the middle of August” if he told new positions, he told new positions Nature.
“I really fear our students and junior companions,” says Shilton. “I have a good career even if I don’t get more science funds. But how do my students do science?”
White House spokesman Kush Desi said about Science Fair:
Presenter members and activity committees express anxiety that quitting a lot of research can drown in the US leadership. “We put ourselves to sacrifice our place like World Leader of Biotechnology and Antiviral-devovally in other countries,” Harris said.
Subramanyam said, perhaps losing leadership is to call the call to the United States. If China above the United States “is the only way to get people here to pay attention to it, then make it to answer a question about investment in China’s space science in space Schace. “Yes, we lose our leadership in science, technology, research and innovation if we continue to cut.”
This article has been copied with permission and first published On July 9, 2025.
