No headaches (1): Learn what critics say

No headaches (1): Learn what critics say

What if you get an excellent pair of ear headphones without costing more than $ 400?

That’s the question of anything, a startup of tech startup, trying to answer the new No headphone (1) Headphones, just opened this week. A set of tech publications has been taken with new headphones before their exposed and launched with a great number of reviews with $ 299 pair of over-evert-evert-everang ares.

No headphones (1) Price

What do critics say about new headphones? For beginners, many agree that they are a large amount of $ 299. The closest comparison points in terms of parts and quality audio items such as Sony wh-1000xm6 Headphones and the Apple Airpods Maxthe two sellers for over $ 400. From that sight, no one is in an advantage.

But what is everything like?

The design

For those who begin, these headphones have a sort of a fun design that can bring some customers, but may ask others. They have big, rectangular cases for ear cups, and they just come in two colors: white and black. Ben Schoon points it to 9pogoogle review:

“There’s no design here the extraordinary, to say the least. Partially rounded, partially rounded design gives the vibes on the cassette tape, which I want,” Schonet’s “letter.

There are many other reviews I read in that sight. If you are exactly in the design or no, there is no appropriate honor to try something.

Defective speed speed

Matt Bolton, in the meantime, ensured to emphasize TechRadar review that headphones are comfortable for the long session, no matter what they look.

“It’s also worth a little bit of division – some people just like a lighter-beight headphone that doesn’t have to be so full-but I find good time,” Letter of Bolton.

The sound

This is the fraudulent side. Small, not design, comfort, or active shape of noise in the noise, is more important than the quality of sound when it comes to headphones. Unfortunately, it is wide broadly in accordance with most reviews that I read it is a place where the price difference is between headphones (1) and the closest competition shown.

That doesn’t say the sound BADHowever, though. on James Review but for GizmodoHe praised the quality of the kanikula in the noise and the audio output in general. It may not be at the Airpods Max level, but there is a $ 250 price difference between the two, so it may be expected.

“I’m still thinking that Airfods Airfods Apple have a small edge of the sound department – the middle of the long texture and room feel more organic and clear,” let’s say but. “That’s said, no one thinks of himself against a competitor who has accused a very premium.”

The Bolton, on the other hand, the more critical of his review for TechRadar.

“The audio is set to the Great Hi-Fri Brand Kef, and reasonably refined, good weight, and wide pleasant,” Bolton’s letter. “But it also feels compressed, and lacking the opening and loud sound I used from the competition test at this price.”

Battery life

Within $ 300, you expect a good battery life from a pair of headphones. As if nothing was given given to the department. Schoon said to his 9to5google review that batteries last 35 hours in ANC has been ond and 80 without it. My kindness, that’s good darn.

Based on these reviews, as if no first part of ear headphones are strong. You can face a little better audio quality than some more expensive models, and you may want the design, but they look like a great value where it can be worth it where it can be worth.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *