I have the privilege of representing two of the striking miners accused of June 1984 eventsNorthulogra police destroyed Orgreave War and other strike files in miners, 24 June). The powerful claim has been done because records are “not outside the time of continuing” and that the destruction “is in line with the Profer Policy and the Data Protection Act 2018”. Nothing now knows whether any of the other forces sent to Orgreave has also broken documents.
“Authorized Professional Practical” issued by policing college in 2023 related to review, maintaining and enduring interest “for public purposes …should have been archived“, Give the fact that the weather is over. In addition, the acts of data protection and its regulations clearly allow for maintaining such material.
Examples of examples of policemen poor in the sun now well known. In the judgment it finally thinks that a detective of South Yorkshire literally dictates the script to officers sitting in the seats of the seats “The Schoolroom”. One question can further reveal the role of association with police officers and home office. But not if police forces are allowed soon to destroy evidence of evidence. The government should move immediately to prevent it.
Edward Rees Kc
London
Government papers saved by National Archives are sometimes restricted or grass, but an important tool for research historians. Will be able to read that Northumbria police destroy files related to orgreave. It may be like a document maintenance process, but Holmes do not have to do that Holmes is why it happens before choosing a government that occurs in orgreave.
Maybe the secretary of the house can be sure that no additional police files are destroying before asking questions, if necessary by cancellation of civilians responsible for setting it. A democratic society requires a proper record of its history, even if it is uncomfortable for some.
Dr. Beith Braid
London socialist socialists group
