As predicted (The Starmer offers ‘many concessions’ on the welfare bill of work rebels, 26 June), a test was made to save the welfare bill. Discoronsented MPs and disabled individuals accept the security that people currently receive independence fees (PIP) or universal credit element will be protected from changes. But the stage is harmful, causing thousands of disabled people who do not need to worry, and can be found in Keir Starmer’s tenure.
There is something more important to have two classes of welfare recipients – the protected current recipients, and those who make future claims. At the same time, it is obvious that the benefits of the system requires again and, especially, people have to support work than to give up on saving.
How to close the starmer in this position is interesting, if it is not unique for a government with a majority and the potential performance of radical and equitable repeating repeatedly in reverse wrongdoing. U-turns look weak and messy, and present them as an answer to active listening may not persuade anyone. Starmmer claims not to be ideologicaland there is an issue; The policy is formed not through a united strategic perspective and aspirations operated by the principle for better life, opportunities and actual equality and economic care.
This is a wrong model, definitely shared divisions between ministers, working Members, taxpayers receive grate. There is great learning and meditation needed by the government; Optics are lost evil, but the disorder of good welfare is a symptom of deeper political disorder.
Dr Melanie Henwood
Hartwell, Northamptonshire
I am a social worker and I support cutting pips. I have experienced many young adults trapped in a cycle of trust, unemployment and riot-style life. They share a belief that the state should fund every aspect of life, and the lack of understanding that benefits are not “from the government” but also distributed to population taxes.
PIP is often admitted to the basis of anxiety or depression, but the idea of working to support itself, or seeking training or education to perform work. The answer? Perhaps a combination of education, early intervention and naked towards cultural change, including reduced pip. Eventually the status quo can’t help young people I work with.
Name and address provided
What is not clear to government statements and coverage of cuts of disability benefits is the relationship of personal independence to act. PIP pays to help further expenses come from disability. People who work and are not at work. It is important to make people stay at work, pay for technical and personal support, health needs, travel and other costs. It also allows people who do not work full-time work. What happens to workers with people they can’t afford more costs? Government clearly does not understand PIP paper in the ability to work.
Good jean
Mankschter
As we approached Parliamentary Vote to the new Welfare bill, considered to have many PIP recipients receiving welfare if it is known as disability allowance. I doubt, for many, scars remained from the system’s transformation.
The revealed is that disability allowance is not addressed to the most in need of it because of their disability. However, accepting new benefits depends on a person’s ability to fill the 40-page form. Next, it depends on with physical and mental strength to challenge the consequence and bring it to a court. This is a suffering and annoying period of time. For many, making this distance, the tribe repeated the DWP scoring and people know that they have their old welfare level. Only a shame that stress makes many medical conditions worse for the individual.
Many years ago, I believe the DWP would like to help those with serious disabilities. These days, I have a lot of confidence in them as they have disabled people (DWP letters now as a subtetxt of “you are a fraud and we will catch you”).
Name and address provided
