“It’s hard to count things that work”
Connect images – Castate / Shutterstock
Its enemy tanks in battlefields, wild animals or cutlery in a busy canteen, hard count things that work. With luck, there is a method that can estimate how much something has something that doesn’t require you to count each other.
The method of reckless approach involves getting a sample – waiting for some animals to wander, then collecting some – marking individuals, after being released by the population. After a few hours, you repeat the process of selecting another group of animals and counting many of those marked.
If you are caught, say, 50 animals at first and mark them all, then when you get back to you with half the animals you’ve seen, it tells you about the whole population. Since half of the sample is marked, it means that half of the whole population is marked – so there should be about 100 individuals. It can provide a reasonable accurate estimate of a population, without seeking and counting each other member.
During the Second World War, Allied statistics want to know how many tanks are made by the German Army. Captured tanks cannot be released, but, as the ingredients of the tank marked by serial numbers, one more method allowed them to make an estimate. They rescued serial numbers allotted or destroyed tanks, working in the mind they were considered in a row and randomly distributed. If the largest serial number of your data is L and the number of caught tanks Nan estimate for the total number of tanks is given to L + L / n.
So, if we have four numbers, the largest of the 80, we can assume the entire 80/4 = 20, so there are about 100 tanks in total. This is known as the German tank problem with statistics.
One of my favorite testimony stories told me a teacher friend, who prompted his students to estimate the forks of schools – it was impossible to count, at any time to be numbered, at any time to be numbered, at any time to be numbered, at any time to be numbered, at any time of use and others were in washing.
Her class “got” is a set of forks and marks everyone with a droplet polish nail, then released them back to the population. A week later, they obtained another sample population and used it to make an estimate of the total number of forks.
Researchers done A similar experiment 20 years ago. A worried number of teaspoons lost in their lab, so they marked a phrase before they were released, studied their actions and proclaiming results. It is effective in science effective: Paper printing has become five tablespoons of spoons returned to stealers.
Katie Steckles is a mathematical, lecturer, youtuber and manchester based authors, UK. He also advised for the new column of the scientific puzzle, the Braintwister. Follow his @steks
For other projects visiting Newscientist.com/maker
Topics:
