LOok to cover any overall opinion of the most opinion and what you are likely to see is a British map divided by blue blue. They are dominant with all parts of the expected seats. Get the latest Yougov mrp pollpublished with good removal this week. MRP (Multilevel regression and posttratification) is a detailed type of poll that creates a conjunction of 42% of the chairs within the Commons house when a general election is made today. Although it is relatively low compared with other new data that is actually expected Most of 30 seats.
But while Farage and some parts of the media want to focus on the number of reforms of chairs that can win, what you need to look at is the real talking of us. Stay with you with it. Because, while the latest Poll in IMov can show reform achieved 42% of UK seats, the number of people in the UK which is actually supporting them, according to the same poll, only 26%. What we really need to get from the latest data is the head “three-quarters of the UK voters not Want Nigel Farage and reform lang “. Only one of the four people they want the government.
If you think about it like this, the funny of the current system is set. This party is not popular with most voters, however the question of Westminster Watchrers is: “Can they win most?” It assumes the discourse of the whole political system and creates the impression that most of the public want something they don’t see.
If you need more convincing how the UK’s first past-the-post system is the sprawling politics of extreme politicians in the UK more than Wales. Wales’s new polls show reform and plaid cymru vying for the first place in front of SIDEDD (Welsh Parliaments) elections next year. The newest poll put the reform in the first place with 29%.
But in Wales there is no real conversation (other than the reform party itself) about reform that can make a government next year. And why? This is because of Cymru we have a system more proportional. There is a simple way that any party can close to a majority with less than one third vote. Call me crazy, but in a democracy, isn’t that mean?
Let me give you an example. on A poll at the beginning of May Watching the objectives of voting in Wales, the plaid cymru earns 30% and reform UK 25%. Upon arriving at the seat projections inside the shut (with 96 seats), the plaid reached 35 and reform of people voting for them. So reform can easily be the largest party of Wales next year. I think it is. But there is only a small moment that it is a government for simple and simple reason for its political miles away from the views of many people in Wales.
Inside width There are six parties to be realistic to win seats: Plan, workingLiberal Democrats, Greens, Conservatives and reforms. All the first four parties who marched creating Faule work. The only party to do these are tories, but all evidence suggests that most of the reforms gets to their expense. So the better reform of, the smaller is the most coming coalition companion. It is the benefit of the proportional democracy of action: it stops the intense guidance of the agenda.
Think you will go out with 12 spouses. Three you want to go a cappuccino, three likes lattes and three wanted flat white. You all want coffee but you don’t agree with what specific one, but as much as you agree with what you want to do. But imagining that the remaining four wants to go out to shut the special beer and break into a bar. Under the first past post, because there are many people who want special beer than cappuccino, lattes or flat white, all of you are judged to go out of piss.
Under the Welsh setup, and straightforwardly healthy democratic systems (such as New Zealand, Finland and Norway), not just the biggest minority. While the UK is as a whole forced to exit a good cup of coffee.
If Keir Starmmer really wants to counter reform, he needs to change an election process that punishes parties with a wide appeal. This one is the biggest change he can possibly can be a prime minister that can prevent difficult seizure of power. Is she have the courage to lose a system that gives her own party 63% of the chairs of 34% of the vote? I’m suspicious of it. But if he is serious about putting the party’s country, he needs.
