How green is this? We pay billion pounds to cut ancient forest In the US and Canada, the tree will be sent across the Atlantic to the diesel tanks, then burn it to the Yorkshire based station.
Happy arrival of the drayb scandal, which British’s largest polluat Able to play climate hero. Reality is billions of public subsidies that the driver makes it generate electricity by burning 300m trees. Now the government is trying to force a EXPANSION that can give a driver estimated £ 1.8bn in public subsidies on top of £ 11bn it’s already gettingthat it continues to circus to 2031.
It’s not green energy. Only math should fear anyone who cares for money or environment. The burning tree creates 18% additional CO2 release than coal. Even if you shorten every driver of the tree breaks, It takes up to a century For the new growth of carbon revised carbon. We need to reach net zero in 2050, not 2125.
However by circus-trick accounting, all of the many drax emisibions suddenly disappear from the British ledger climate. They’re so easy to want – considered “zero”While the company becomes our greatest contributing to climate disruption.
Unusual, this scandal combines opposing the whole political spectrum. From vegetables to reform, from the star of the morning to daily telegraph, there is rare approval that Drandi represents all wrongs in our climate policy method.
Public Account Committee in Labor Condemnad Drax as a “white elephant” allowed to “mark one’s own homework” while claiming to “billions of” in subsidy. A committee agreed to the Lord, saying that Parliament should see key documents Before allowing any funds.
I do not agree with Ed Miliband to all – obviously have different views of nuclear power. I respect the energy secretary of energy to facilitate the climate crisis, and it deserves the additional subsidies half of what was previously offered for drax. But that’s exactly why going on the drax subsidy to everyone is very disappointing.
When Miliband announced his “ramp up” plans Biomass burning back in 2009He really strives to seek replacement of fossil fuels. But 16 years of, this policy wandered badly. The intended one bridge to change the strength of real remissions that are worse.
If, On MondayThe homes of the Lord vote to extend this unchanged burning wood for another four years, what can prevent these subsidies again? And why should the government face a strong unreliable as driver? Perhaps the most harmful is what is refusing to refuse to reveal. After BBC damage Investigating the Worm In the company’s destruction on Canadian mainests, Drax asked the Auditor KPMG, hoping for a clean health bill. However, evidence is very damaging that reports are still Hidden from the public.
If drax does not hide, why don’t you publish these reports? A former teatrical officer published whistleblowers accused of deliberately hides inexpensive works to secure the subsidy. The case, currently settled, produces questions of dishonesty that should disqualify any company from public funds.
Additional billion-billion drivers are finding helps to build enough air capacity and solar power in millions of homes. This can make permanent work in real-changed industries, not temporary periods to destroy unstable ecosystems. Every mib pound spent wood burning a pound without investing in technologies that can give net zero. While other countries mainly air, solar storage and battery, we burn the first fuel known to the people.
There was a large government’s pledge loophole to stop burning drayfs flaming from the main forest. Their drax restrictions are only available on the power supply subsidy. Drax wants to have the power of private data in data centers but no plans to prevent the destruction of the ancient forests in the power of the 21st century AI.
That means drax can worsen despite the main forests than it is now. The MPs have lost confidence in the government’s ability to conduct the driver – criticism from parliamentary committees became fierce.
The environmental movement does not fight to build the renewed force is that politicians can facilitate the burning of ancient millennia. True climate action means making difficult choices, not to hide behind accounting tricks that make our releases disappear in paper while worse than reality.
Time working MPs to speak; Fighting is hard for net zero. Many subsidies for the wooden burning tray on behalf of maintenance more fuel.
