I agree with the opinion of Simon Tisdall (Trump, Netanyahu and Khamenei, three angry old men to bring us all killed, 15 June). Unalicated decisions of these leaders did not occur in a vacuum. Like Tisdall’s writing: “The roots of large conflicts often reached decades – and it was true to Israel-Iran Vendetta, dates of 1979 revolution in Islam.” I suggest reaching further in the 1950s, when Israel built the Nuclear facility in Dimona And Charles de Gaulle decided to end French support unless Israel included not draining (NPT).
After John F Kennedy’s ultimatum for the safeguards, Israel accepted six inspects, until Richard Nixon intensified its nuclear emptiness, given Israel continued to be nuclear. Israel hidden nuclear status, refuses to follow the NPT as opposed to the national security interests, and adopted strikes to the east installing nuclear reactors. As a result, nuclear reactors are destroyed in Iraq and Syria (in 1981 and 2007 In fact) and, in the US cooperation, ruining Iranian nuclear facilities in malware stuxnet (leaking and spreading).
The ambiguity allowed Israel to avoid legal restrictions on American military support and economic to the nuclear-armed state (other than NCEAR members). The current crisis appeared because, as Tisdall wrote, Donald Trump was entered the previous nuclear agreement (which Tehran was respected and fell into Benjamin Netanyahu. If, later, a nuclear showdown is avoided in the Middle East, all countries must have the right to develop nuclear energy for civil purposes and duties to be submitted to NPT rules. Even when the current conflict ends, unless Israel is involved in the NPT, the end bomb finally the bomb. In Western Media there is a conspiracy in the silence of it.
CORRADADO PIRZIO-BIROLI
Brussels, Belgium
Jonathan Bleteland, found long-term conflicts of Iran in nuclear weapons of nuclear conjugation of conflict in the Middle East to replace nuclear growth (Netanyahu attacked Iran to avoid an ‘having extistemental threat’. He can do this worse, 13 June). He mentioned North Korea as an example, for Iran, in a country that ensures its safety by maintaining nuclear weapons, but here is the theory of destruction of destruction. If North Korea is safe, why is not Israel, with an important nuclear nuclear capability?
If it is controlled Iran Is a rogue actor who does not follow the “rules” of each other that it is ensuring destruction, why does any nation’s armed nuclear safe from the actors armed from rogue actors? Each effort should be placed in developing an international inspection enforcement, control, reducing and elimination of the regime all The topic countries, instead of unilateral pre-emptive work, in all their terrible and unpredictable consequences.
Dr Anthony Isaacs
London
The three angry old men who can bring us all killed “, what about Vladimir Putin? That makes four horsemen in the apocalypse Simon Tisdall foretell.
Hubert Cassel
Farnham, Surrey
APROPOS your report (Israel and Iran Broaden Strike on the third day of the developing war, 15 June), saying that Iran is somewhat satisfied with its nuclear agreement in the west. In fact, nuclear agreement is President Barack Obama’s greatest gift to US and Iran. But President Donald Trump, instead of building agreement by establishing diplomatic relationships, decided to crush it, so the clock turns to the US-Iran relationships.
In addition, Washington, not only satisfied with withdrawal from the agreement, chose to focus on the said threat to Iranian nuclear in the military action against Iran. Is it not a similar threat to Iraqi nuclear President George HW Bush Congress approval For US military action against Saddam Hussein, resulting in deaths of more than 461,000 people, including 4,598 US soldiers and 179 British service personnel?
Randhilh Singh Bains
Gats Hill, London
