THere are two ways of seeing events in the Middle East last year and a half. One is that the answer is 7 October 2023 a break from the past. Hamas attacks prompted a response to Israel who seemed impossible to fit the boundaries set for international laws or consisting of Gazaography – Gaza, the Gaza, the Gazaography, Invasion of Southern LebanonTHE Occupation with buffer zone In southwestern Syria and airstrikes across the country, and now attack it against Iran.
Then have the explanation of these events about a historical proceeding. The peace of the region is the result of a quick quo condition that is often weak in disruption. It only looks because it depends on different reasons, working together, as a settlement. This good balance is set to a government of Israel currently set today in pursuit of one’s own agenda, rewritten to the future of the region in ways that cannot explain.
One of the elements of this peaceful peace is the presence of the powers of the Gulf as intermediaries. The Gulf Rapprochement with Iran is not motivated by human trade or feelings, but more pragmatic is needed for stability. Some Gulf states also crossed a historic red line and recognized Israel to Sign Abraham’s Acoment or begins with a Normalization process. Now these countries have found themselves covered between two distorted sides and are at risk of opening the alliance with Israel, the US, with close military and economy.
The status quo also depends on the control of Palestinian rights to a degree that everyone is happy with all; Everything except Palestinians, of course. In a sense, Palestinian problem has been neutralized. If the attack is Gaza It begins, reveals Israel’s views and purposes, which raises a new NACBA. It also brought Iran and its proxes, Hozbollah and the Houthis of Yemen, playing as Defendants of Palestinian rights. Once Iran entered the frame, Israel felt empowered to act without breaks or criticism, no return.
There is something else to eat – the justice of the actions of Israel is more than bitter. With the safe people of the Jews as justification for unprecedented support, and the importance of Israel as a close partner in a strategic region, Carte Blanche has been provided for the country to protect itself. But it depends on Israel who responds to any threats in a proportional way, so as not to make additional incompetence. Israel did not only respond to the threats, it was slowed by that it became a primary cause of its own insecurity, and other parts of the region.
Withdrawal from allies also depends on the transparency between camps. Colossal military, economic and political cover are given to understanding that anyone in charge of Israel’s government has no other motives for participating in conflict for citizens for citizens. Trust is broken by the current Prime Minister, Benjamin NetanyahuWho uses the war to strengthen public support for his or her own political career. Not only does Israel make it less safe, but further categorizing that assurance as he played the protector’s role.
Relationships with key ally tried to be in Gaza as public pressure from the inside of western countries grew, fed with high children in hungry children, hospitals and rows of body bags. By opening a new front and join another enemy, the government of Israel has the opportunity to restore the terms of Its agreement with these sponsors, and the historical account that this is the victim, who acts in bad faith. It is here, once more in need of support, suffer strikes and casualties of civilians in the hands of a fierce neighbor.
Stories of people who died of starvation in Gaza or the hungry killed while choosing for food, falling from headlines. The uninterrupted attack on West Bank and the expand illegal habitats ripped from view. The pressure that began to build In Israel to allow additional help and honor a ceasefire replaced with same defenses Mealy We’ve seen in the first days of Gaza’s war, plus the same degrade to urge “control”. The clock is reset.
Regarding the attacks of Iran, Israel appeared to have taken the Lesson of the Iraqi, claiming that it moved the basin based on the wisdom that the world should rely on the world. How close is the threat? Who has the right to decide if a “pre-emptive strike” is justified? And who is the right to respond to an illegal unilateral attack? What we know today is that global politics is run on the basis of exceptions and different benchmarks in sovereignty. Yes, Iran has violated nuclear nuclear obligations withoutBut Israel refused to sign up with them all.
These differences in the past become more susceptible, because Israel and the US are “good men”, and Iran about an “axis of evil”. But the collision of Israel and the US credibility seemed true interlocutors, their security considerations and followed international law, made these campaigns that were less straightforward.
Here is the real war that Israel fights. Iran still remains a measure of political ability and military capacity higher for comfort for Israel. And as Israeli’s credibility window closes, it is more important to reduce the credibility of the political Iranian and military capabilities. But what is the endgame? Does Israel check a fixed campaign, after this withdrawal, satisfied with the results? Or that is not a scenario scenario, considering countertrikes that have been challenged. It’s all looking like Gaza – Like: Wasteless Endless; or renewal regime without a plan.
The same campaigns in Israel – the propaganda is one and the one on earth – contributes to something: they consider half political, teating management and experimenting with “caution” the specified mean terms. But the region is not just the back yard of Israel. These are other people’s houses and they have their own politics, histories, populations and security requirements, especially, subject to a country that only decided that self-agenda.
