“We’re here.”
“I know it’ll come.”
“It doesn’t end well.”
This is my first reaction to President Trump he has activated the California National Guard and the Lunes sources say that backup will serve backup. I do not claim many Presciles. Like his breakdown with Elon Musk last week, his military deployment against protesters was not better. Uncertainty is about time and pretext.
Tugoti ako nga maathag: Kung gisundan nimo ang timeline bahin sa nahitabo sa labing hinungdanon, usa ka komunidad sa Dakong Los Angeles, nga wala ako nagtawag sa National Guard (o sa mga Marines) – sa Gavin) – Gavin Newsom – gimatuto. The last time President activated the guard without a request from a governor was 1965, when Alabama Gov. George Wallace in his state. Newsom’s opposition that the presence of guard does not have to minimize the situation as slowly becomes. Kamdasan suing the Trump administration for illegal deportation of the guard.
I’m skeptical. Trump’s order is not as unlawful to be on the face – however. He did not demand the action of instruction, but Section 12406 in Title 10 in US Codethat allow president to deploy the guard to protect federal agents in the course of their duties. But it violates one of the most serious “democratic behavior” both parties seem to respect if the other party is in power. And it is a behavior worth honor.
One of the reasons the value of honor is that behavioral violations give birth to more habitual violations. In fact, that’s a part point of Newsom. Only notification of the guardian activation appears to arouse more Mayhem, and that instead makes Trump’s decision more politically useful.
And that brings me why it doesn’t end well.
Each time a protester burns a car, drop a stone or break into a window, the protester stops being a lawful one. And as opposed to many left wings that are nonsense, disruption is not only false and illegal, it is not popular in politics. Then-Massachusetts Gov. Calvin Coolgidge becomes a national star by calling the Lord to reward in 1919 Boston police strikethat ignores riots and loot. In 1968, Richard Nixon used The riots after Martin Luther King Jr. to win the presidency of a promise of restoration of law and order.
Fringe has left a long love relationship with “propaganda in the work“A stupid concept that holds direct or revolutionary action that attracts the masses of their cause. In America, almost did not work. But for some reasons, many major developments have gone tongue when it comes to judging their fringes unfairly.
The political utility of domestic riot is extremely intense and consequently under Donald Trump because he subscribed to his own theory of propaganda in the work. Trump has long been hetic to use the military to fail domestic unrest. In a playboy in 1990 interviewHe expressed praise for the Communist Communist Party to show “power of strength” in crushing Tianmen Prots. In his first term, he was reported to want troops to burn protesters After killing George Floyd. Since the beginning of his second term, his administration pushes politics, legal and rhetorical claims that he must be given power to work, especially in trade and immigration.
I think that claims that are mostly innocuous as bad as a matter of law, facts and those democratic behavior. And politics, if headings are full of stories about families separates or legal immigrants that taxkey For writing editorial college newspapers, administration is in defense. But when the mob rioters Waymo Cabs On fire, the debate is exactly where he wants. Democrats and many media numbers have taken hairs that are divided, the lame in the right to protest, while social and cable news are flooded with images of violence and destruction.
I haven’t seen a reason to doubt that there is enough people who are willing to give the Trump exactly what he wants. And there is no clothes, not like his first term, the abilities are not only on the streets, they are in the White House. Different Secretaries in Cabinet, White House Officials and Vice President is all who seek each other in address on GROWTH,, snrog and “Los Angeles free. “
I was sincerely wrong, but the consequences of Congress and the courts were given the courts, I think it was leading, perhaps in a competition in theories of propaganda in the work. That may or may not end well for Trump but it will surely end in bad for the United States.
Insights
La Times Insights Gives AI-Ginaleans analysis of Venters in Voices to offer all points in view. Views cannot be found in any news articles.
view
Views
The following content becomes AI run by confusion. Los Angeles editorial staff do not create or edit content.
Ideas stated in the piece
- The author argues that President Trump’s Deptump’s National Guard to prevent political immigration protests such as the 1968 campaign of Richard Nixon.
- Trump’s trust in section 12406 in title 10 US code framed as a behavioral habit that promotes actions so for additional executive infeach(4).
- The piece condemns progressive leaders for the consolidation of condemnation of violent protests, which states that the chaos often return politics and strengthened Trump’s reconciliation.
- Trump’s praise for tactics to authority, such as Tirananmen Square, quoted as evidence of his willingness to use militarized energy against domestic opposition.
Different views of the subject
- California officials, including Govin Newsom and Attorney General Rob Bonta, fighting that trumpling federal deployment, with no guards activation communication(1)(2)(5).
- Legal experts highlighting 10 USC §12406 admitted once since 1970, asking about fulfillment for rebellion such as rebellion such as rebellions such as rebellions such as rebellion such as rebellion(2)(4).
- State leaders reasoned deploying flowing tensions unnecessarily, as local law enforcements have about federal troops than protection than protection(2)(3).
- Case case indicating Trump’s action as a non-federal overreach of the state sovereignty, President Lyndon Johnson compared it – a situation that actively hindered civil rights(2)(5).
