In the editor: Santa Monica residents who live near the Waymo Charging Station are roughly angry with the Cacophony made by the befer to the faulty party vehicles (“Residents of Santa Monica go to war against Waymo, including disruption of non-driver taxes,” May 29). The Waymo, also, the victim of ITane government regulations in need of these backup beeters in all kinds of vehicles. Does these beepers prevent many accidents? Is there a government agency fully considered the number of collisions prevented by backup beeders against the number of individuals they drove? If it is seriously investigated, I think regulations can be scraped or reduced and we can all benefit from a little noise.
Murray Levy, Aptos, Calif.
..
In the editor: How dare the city of Santa Monica Cave on Waymo? Buried at the end of the article, we know that instead of seeing ways to break down in designed urban rental to reduce lightup safety regulations. That makes cars more dangerous for the whole situation, because no drivers of cars to warn us of a conventional horn horn.
This strange lack of public interest rates should be judged by Santa Monica Boter in the next election.
Jon Merritt, Los Angeles
..
In the editor: I am bold in residents of Santa Monica who felt disappointed with the unexpected noise of all way of the waymarging their neighborhoods. Overall, I believe we need to ban all Robotaxis. This is a product without needing. It stole jobs from human drivers, competing in public transit, adding gridlock and, if you are caught by a lost robotaxi, another point of hostility to change towns.
Robert Davis, Tarzana
