TChildren’s to slave to capitalists – that is the purpose of the new “Trump account”, to give each new child born in the US second term of the President $ 1,000 to invest in the stock market. Today, small shareholders can be identified by US companies that they have invested. “Hey … I have an instance of McDonald’s” an example given by Senator Ted Cruz. This is an element of Donald Trump’s surprise “big beautiful bill“, Which gives $ 1.1TN to tax cuts to the rich medicaid cuts, food assistance and education department.
It includes a variety of policies from the righteous parties around the world who looked at, on its face, to be pro-young or pro-family. In Hungary, Viktor Orbán announced An Exemption Exemption Exemption For mothers of two or three children – past, only mothers of four or more children are free. While, Nigel Farage in the UK proclaims That reform ends two benefits of two children.
However, policies are nothing. Trump’s baby’s baby is not a pro-family The method of cleaning poverty, but his way of making “shareholding democracy”, Margaret Argaret dreamed when he was promised to be a car “.If you see Sid, tell him“), Water and electricity with British Airways and so on. It doesn’t work, as mostly sold these unpaid parts for a quick income: in 2022, Only 14% to British people directly holds any part.
Britain has a Child Trust Fund (CTF) For each child until it is cruelly inserted by the coalition government. . Parents who are able to contribute further. But the purpose of the labor is strongly different from Trump’s. The idea is to make a small teeth of great learning injusts so each child of 18 is something to see them on their way.
The average £ 2,000 pot is only one person covered in the nest, but for non-mum and dad banks that can contribute to driving lessons or leasing costs of driving or educational costs. When 8.4 million people do not have storageThose from families who do not risk forced into bad jobs without escape, due to lack of options to buy in little money. Now, its restoration is no longer on the agenda; In these very difficult times, the government should have to contact the Promised Manifesto to cut the child’s poverty.
Gavin Kelly, the Begetter of CTF at Gordon Brown’s Treasury, no research effects of its CTF received. Research for research has been freed off once the policy itself is killed, but in a study done before the CTF of Lonics schools in analysis of analysis of “early asset holding have positive effects of late salaries, job prospects, excellent general health and reduced malaise “. He said it allows young people to take risks,” and It is important to take risk for higher returns of late life “.
Kelly has a lot of anecdotes. She just met a river family without keeping whose son uses her ctf to buy an old car she couldn’t get to travel to a apprenticeship 45 minutes away. Nearly 55,000 18-year-olds will come to their funds, but it will end up 2029, if 14-year-old managers (18-year-olds have lost fundraising Waiting to have).
Back in 2005, Labor had a poor poverty that fell in shock, and it was a small attempt to relieve the gap between the richest and poorest. But this is more. Here is another symbol of the Labor Pro-Labor Spirit – Welcome each child and develop their life with certain start centers. Labor is never mindful of pronunciation, but “every child is important” struggling with the policy to put children on their feet, with child tax credits between pro-child impulses. The employment inherited by a Falling in childbirth In 1997, but it was resurrected until 2010, and then fell From two debris of a woman in 1.5 of the years tory. Correlation is not important, but the non-broken years of child cuts and youth services cannot help, with a rise in the house and child care with birth, and Young people are worse than their parents are at the age of producing age.
Happiness to children are stripped, like school arts and sports lost, and additional educational colleges, entertainment parks, the parks and every childhood support has been consumed. Even the child’s death rate rising for the first time in generations. As well as the child’s child rate, at 8% in England in 2023, a third it would be avoided, according to Holy College of Paediatrics and Health Health at Cholher College of Paediatrics and Health Health. This is all under title governments that enjoy two child benefits, a (failed) eugenic test to prevent the wrong kind of children adding populations.
Sadness is the majority of UK women and other organizations for economic fighting countries and development (OECD) countries with many children than they do. In 2016, they wish on average 2.3 – Well over the population of replacement population 2.1, let the current rate of 1.57.
Leaders to meet like Trump and Viktor Oban Would like to own Provatalist arguments – don’t let them go. As the social market market (SMF) REPORT With Baby Bust and Boom Boom: Liberal case check for pronunciation, a country celebrating childhood is always a better place for everyone. As abortion is a correct, so is the right to childbirth.
So why delete the benefit limit of two-child – as Ministers noticed they thought – About more than the child’s poverty. Scrapping it indicates the change of an optimistic nature of children who are always in DNA. Any vision of the future should accept a younger population: older people are not a diamond country or innovation. Falling fertility means long-term content. Children punish us that we only lead long to social and economic damage.
For children receiving one, the “Trump account” may have something good. But regardless of his motive, the pronunciation of the pronunciation of the pronunciation will be destroyed. Experience from around the world Suggesting hiring has little effect: France and Sweden both have higher birations than Hungary, regardless of tax breaks. So Trump’s Offer $ 5,000 to mothers for each birth can be destroyed with no social environment caring for all children. Neither is his bill tend to turn into mini-capitalist children.
