In November, voters approved Los Angeles County Measures gwhich promised to change county management. The process to carry out its reforms begins today to make leaders in government reform, and La County residents, as residents must participate, “The Devil is in detail.”
During the very high, the county emphasizes people in Los Angeles. With almost 10 million residents, our county larger than 40 US statesAlthough it is governed by only five supervisors, each manage about 2 million people. The result is reactionary leadership that continues to status quo when the challenges we face in need of speed and innovation.
At its core, measure g about ensure the County will meet the greatest challenges. Then, a government’s design shapes the characteristics of those who manages us. The Board of Supervisors will be expanded, over time, nine members from five. And a selected County Executive will provide for the separation of executive powers and legislatives, and a more accountable government in the province.
Consider for example the broken fire in January. Palisades and food fires in the towns of Los Angeles, Malibu, Pasadena and Sierra Madre. The biggest destruction of the terms of death, lost houses and residents moved to the non-neighborhood of Aladena. Instead of having a voice and a plan that leads to fire response and county levels, residents must navigate to a district district district maze to put the pieces in the district of district. Consider if there is only one selected executive executive guide a regional strategy – this is the future we can.
Now let’s think of homelessness – the most inspiring issue facing the county year every year. Despite the spending of billions of dollars each year, the county has not yet moved the needle enough to resolve the issue. If an audit was ordered by the Judge of the US David O. Carter, the County learned foods that were not under the city-county Los Los Los Los los the main Ehervational principal. Is this effective management? Is this the best we can do?
In their new book “soul,” Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson teach the need for active government to amve the innovative areas facing the Los Angeles face. But the status of the status quo is not easy. So many entities can prevent change – allowed by underperform, vendors overcharging, organizations of non-million dollars available for them.
Today, the vision and maintenance of the county change on annual basis with the rotating chair structure of five member boards. Most actions decided based on district preferences rather than regional is better. But as those who have the fathers say, the government is best in checks and balances. County Supervisors, as the legislative branch, there must be a healthy level of friction to an executive to keep them accountable to people. Measures the addition of G’s to a selected executive executive establishes checks and balances. This change is critical to leadership must solve major crises such as homelessness and emergency response.
The new task force also means the scope of a new independent conduct commission ordered on a scale.
Measure G is not just government reform – it is also a democratic change. The Los Angeles County government form has not changed since 1912, when our population is 500,000 and women have no right to vote. To have the World Class Transportation Countywide, in transit to a green economy, minimize the differences between the rich and poor requirements.
As the Task Force starts the process to enforce the scale approved by Voter G, we need voices in all 88 cities to help introduce the provincial government. Tuning for our living meetings, email your ideas to the Task Force and make sure the Task Force will include a community task strategy in the coming community in the coming months.
We cannot afford to waste this opportunity. As a Member of the Task Force, I accept your participation in the county shape we should all be. This fun process begins on Friday – join us.
Sara Sadhwani is a professor of college college in Pomona and appointed by Supervisor Lindsey Horvath, co-author contrary to the Task Force. Search.lacounty.gov.
Insights
La Times Insights Gives AI-Ginaleans analysis of Venters in Voices to offer all points in view. Views cannot be found in any news articles.
view
Views
The following content becomes AI run by confusion. Los Angeles editorial staff do not create or edit content.
Ideas stated in the piece
- Measure purposes to meet long Los Angeles County Contrance Exactions by participating in checks and balances, claiming this structure will improve the crisis and accountability(1).
- Supporters highlight new failures such as delayed fire recovery at Altadena and wrongly handling house funds as regional requirements of regional management requirements(1).
- Reform supporters as democratic change, found the county government structure has not been updated since 1912 and should succeed in changing the modern challenges and climate change(1).
Different views of the subject
- Measurement of critics measures of GS effects unknown communities such as Altadena, while Los Angeles city residents remain unaffected by most legislation(2).
- Some express anxiety that resistance from agencies agencies, vendors, and non -profit benefits of current opaque systems can damage the rising reforms intended to increase transparency and recovery.
- Skepticans are skeptical when the expansion of the bureaucracy is through a new right to executive and behavioral morals can complicate decision making decisions about effective government(1)(2).
