John McDonnell clearly requires responsibility, with Jeremy Corbyn, for “policy platform” that they have been with the hope “in the end of the labor returns to power” (Starmmer and Co. are the legacy of labor. We should control our party – before it’s too late, May 28). In the entire article, McDonnell argues for an alternative approach to following the current Prime Minister, Keir Starmer.
He did not recognize that, when standing on this platform Corbyn / McDonnell policy working Missing two general elections. By absence of these elections they judge this country in seven years of tory’s sign – seven years where tourists have corrupted. However, I noticed that no one was in his piece that McDonnell offered any kind of apology for the years in Mayhem.
Starmmer is at least attempt to place this right. He changed party policies to make it more undelected, and he (grateful) successfully. Now let him close and end the job. The passage of “Controlling” returns to McDonnell and his sidekicks will only ship to work in the wilderness.
Shaun Soper
Midhurst, West Sussex
John McDonnell The Malaise of Labor knows, which, he reminds us, affects not only its members of No 10 (Hubris) but the full activity (frustration). Almost a year ago seven MPs – including him – they were suspended when they voted against the benefits of two children, and hope, in hope, when they return. However, while he warned us, we faced a strong crisis.
He is right to indicate how to handle labor as “shy”. Receiving Tone-Deaf of Corporate Visting is dismissed with no significant sniping on the left. Try citing that as an excuse when attempting to retain support on the doorstep and being met with “they’re all the same” while those desperate for change look over your shoulder and reform.
The number of MPs voted by the government, or abstain, if it attempts to cut people’s benefits can be a measure of how bad the party is.
Peter Mangan
Bewenham, Kent
John McDonnell’s criticism of the labor can be to be music in acceptable ears of people who are disappointed with a government’s lack of development in the Government of Starmer’s Government of Starmer’s Government.
I reminded Tony Blair’s first years, where many were disappointed in progress. But see how the change and fruit, until 2010 work is considered an overspending, uninterrupted, removable government government.
In 2010, in the days of Gordon Brown’s Tenure, I remembered to share a platform with John McDonnell, which scares brownen brown as a reasonable monetarist who failed the labor movement and the people. What we give to all social spending levels today.
Trevor Hopper
Lewes, East Sussex
Like John McDonnell, I am in my 70s, a lifetime of labor voters, and I am a party member for more than 40 years. I just noticed that every government worked in my life, including the Great Great Government of Attlee, accused of betrayal and abandoned principles, most of the people who claimed to be in nothing. I also noticed that, despite criticisms, it was governments of work that gave almost every social development and economic growth of the British ordinary voters for more than seven decades.
Alex Gallagher
Senses, North Ayrshire
Bridget Phillipson says this is the moral mission “to this Labor Government to ensure fewer children grow in poverty” (Report, 27 May). What is “fewer”? Shouldn’t there be no kids growing in poverty, or I lost?
Simon Lauris Hudson
Pontefracraft, West Yorkshire
