In the editor: Columnist Lz Granderson correctly says the removal of camps and taking people should strengthen our downtowns (“The push of many Americans who are nonsense not means to survive downownns,” May 24). However, the current rate of taking people from habitats and homes is not to be disturbed because there is a lack of cheap residence.
In my role as vice chair at the Buena Park Center Center Center Oversight Commission, I see no 15% clients to go a lot of home navigation support. The lucky couple to get home are at the center of more than a year, a place designed for a short time to stay.
We need more creation techniques to ensure safe place to call home available for all. We need to build more home and, while waiting for five to 10 years to build, we need solutions to the housing of homes alone and leading homes. We also need many programs to prevent people from falling homeless in the first place, as the help of rent, the help of lusting the hangs of hitting the hits. Our state, County and City budgets can support these methods.
Barry Ross, Santa Ana
..
In the editor: It is really frustrating with a Times in Los Angeles who said officers should not focus on “homeless places to be uninhabited. We have a skyrocketing populated population because we don’t have enough places to live with people.
Changing the rules to build a lot of houses is the best thing that politicians can do to help homeless people. Sure, homeless do not move to all new tower of town, but people who live new towers free from people who are greater.
Or we can keep blocking new habits and the rich people will take the poorest populations today and the number of homeless people in the downtowns grow.
Josh Albreekton, South Pasadena
