The Guardian view of ‘Great Beautiful Law of Trump: Discard con at a Class-War Manifesto | Edotatoiso

The Guardian view of ‘Great Beautiful Law of Trump: Discard con at a Class-War Manifesto | Edotatoiso

OsOnald Trump’s “A big beautiful“Budget Pug-and Through the US House of Representatives on Thursday – a brilliant populist package hiding a brutal class agenda. No tax on FRAGMENT! place Tax Tax Credits! But look better and the bill is a strong hand. Middle-class Perks Expire 2028 – Just as Mr Trump’s second term finish – while permanent tax cuts for rich, and delaying cuts of means tried benefitinconsistent entrator. It’s not a budget. It’s a bait-and-switch. It turns out to be a warning of democratic democracy in a responsibility – one punishing themselves base. Republicans understand what Democrats are not yet: Disadvantages are not the danger. This is what you do with things that matter.

This supercharge bill does not match: A $ 1.1TN Giveaway to American earnings more than $ 500,000 one year – funded by pushing the poorer families Medicaid and help with food. It condemns the subsidies of Green Energy. expert Say it can add $ 3.1TN to debt – but it’s more than a millionaire tax breaks. it raise Topping immigration and customs with 365% for control, 500% for departments – fuel for Mr Trump’s crackdown.

This is also a trickle-up economy for sale as class class class. Democrats voting against it now face opposition optics “tax relief for Waitresses” – even if a third To such workers can only pay tax on income and no longer benefit. The bill now moves the Senate, where Republicans should juggle with fiscal lawkishness in pity with the silence of pro-rich tax cuts – hope turn cannot notice their Baason. No Filibuster battles, but any change in the Senate should pass a simple majority – and then live the hardliners or provocative support of hardliners or provocative support of hardliners or provocative support of hardliners irritating support of hardliners or irritating support of hardliners or irritating support of rough.

But many democrats remain trapped in the budget time dogma. While Republicans Rack shortage For the rich, Democrats cling to the reagan-era Byrd Rule and “pay for” logic – treating a The 1970s economy as the current fact. The first is a constraint of the procedure, but it was born in a political age of the balanced budget, and it continued to count ambition by asking for offsets for imperial morals. Of 2021, the most effective Anti-Poverty policy In decades expired because some democrats are mad at this funding, however RECORDS Cement in corporate.

US should tax RICH Proper – less because widespread inequality is destroying democracy. But Economist Stephanie Kelton is right that inquire about disabilities less “what size?” But “who can benefit?” That is the need of democratic language. Not budget sermons. Disadvantages should be for public purpose, no Private Spanish. Instead of the stories about the debt, Democrats should say that America can run a disability to fund healthcare, home and green tech – Donor cash in cash.

The real danger does not turn off the TAX-and-mental agenda of Mr Trump – it is taken by arithmetic. Voters don’t like better calculations, they want better convictions. on 2021Joe Biden urged Conservative Democratic To break their addiction to “pay-fors” and accept a political goal – spending the ideals, not to account for gimmicks. Their refusal about that the party struggled with its message today. Mr. Trump’s budget can blow in disability, but it also blows the illusion that the Democrats can win numbers. The only way from the trap is to fight not about spending the federal government but who is spent it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *