The is independent Sentencing review For England and Wales under David Gauake is a landmark sign in the same crisis in prison and in an endemic criminal behavior that has failed in decades. It created the platform for penal policy that a new direction required. As Mr. Gake saidit will take courage from government. Encourage, the Lord Chancellor, Shabana Mahmood, accepted Most of the principle recommendations, at least some exceptions. However, the need now is for continuing action, investment and consequences.
If review has been established in 2024, prisoners for men with 99% capacity in 18 months and an influx of additional prison sanctions after the summer riots. Manages the exemption measures Promoting some pressures, but the need for areas expected to river 19,500 in 2028. The bad traditions of the overpriced investments in new prisons and non-custodial alternatives. Both of these things now have to change radicals and measurable ways. The gauke review takes a wide method of carrying. Many prison should be part of the answer, but MS Mahmood and G. Gauuke is right that Britain cannot continue this crisis. That can only end with different insult policies, which review makes suggestions all from judging violent sanctions for more dangerous words that have many needs, including pregnant women.
Ang sentral nga sugyot sa report mao ang pagpakunhod sa mga numero sa prisohan pinaagi sa “nakuha nga pag-uswag” nga mga tudling-pulong nga adunay usa ka bahin sa tudling (lakip ang pag-tag sa pagdumala (lakip ang pag-tag sa pagdumala (lakip ang pag-tag sa pagdumala) ug pagpadayon sa pag-tag sa pag-tag) ug pagpadayon sa pag-tag sa pagdumala) ug pagpadayon sa pag-tag sa pagdumala) ug pagpadayon sa pag-tag sa pagdumala) ug pagpadayon sa pag-tag sa pag-tag) ug pagpadayon sa Tagging the tagging) and continuing tagging) and continuing to manage most of the jailed prison sanctions will be eliminated, a step that helps many prisoners. Suspended sentences should be used more. Reviewed in review of its suggestions can save almost 10,000 male prison areas. These suggestions should be actively supported. However, they can never improve the need to invest in a large quality non-chief support. Outbreaks should be properly monitored and, in more cases than possible to repair care of today, made by useful non-criminals.
That means tagging, but it also means more to pay and appreciate the test officials well. Britain’s test services are under the pressures that are worse than those who face prisons, with cuts of staff numbers, excess cases and insufficient technology. They cannot Play their share In this new method without serious investment. Correctly said to review that relationships between test staff and offenders must be priority. However it may not be without training, education, work experience and rehabilitation rehabilitation for custody and non-guilty offenders. For this new start there is meaning and credibility, these needs should be fully visible to the government Review review Next month.
Gauye Review has a wider lesson for the UK state too. The review charged Between the crisis in October. It is reported, close to 200 pages, and adopted as policy in just seven months. It provides MS Mahmood with a moment of renewal of radical change. Compare that model of delivery and momentum with a series, always led by the judge, unemployed questions but no guarantee of any lasting change to follow.
