There is a set of very special numbers, known as the basic constant nature of nature, which cannot explain. Where are they from? Finding if they are, in fact, always the key to opening this lasting mystery.
Physics is a mathematical description of nature. We use models, equations and formulas to describe how systems work and predict how they move in the future. This procedure proves successful, explained everything from the subatomic particles behavior on Evolution of the whole universe.
But there are aspects of these equations that are contrary to explain. Any time we tried a hypothetical model and connect it to the real world, we need to introduce special numbers. These numbers get some aspects of nature left outside our equations. For example, if I want to predict the action of a ball ball, I have to know how powerful Weight is. But no theory explains why gravity has the energy it made. We can only measure the amount independent and insert it into equations.
For decades, physicists consume different lists of most important basic norms. Usually, there is a little more than two dozen to them. They describe things like strength in Four forces of naturethe masses of basic particles, and aspects of space-time, such as speed of light.
We don’t know where these numbers are and why do they have values they do. A way of studying it is to know if they are actually always. If any of these numbers move even time or in full space, that is an important explanation. Differences to those who often tell us that it is never basic and rather a reflection of our ignorance of a deep physics theory.
For example, if I don’t know how gravity works, I can still measure the acceleration of things when almost ground. I can assign a “basic” frequent number of this number and measure this 9,8 meters per second square. I can even predict the delicious balls that are perfectly good with this hand number.
But careful observations reveal that this acceleration is never steady. This may change depending on the high or even the location of WORLD. This will tell me that something is deeper continued – in this case, with a universal force of gravity.
Physics and astronomers attempt different experiments to find differences in constant. Finally, it requires a huge amount of data to seek for less slightly transfer. Scientists can accomplish this by examining a system for very high times or see deep in the cosmos. Wherever, we can try to see if some often or other changes in time.
For example, astronomers use distance measurements conflagincredible bright sources of radio release from early universe. They also studied at The background of the cosmic microwavewhich is radiation released when the universe is cooled from a warm state in the billions of billions of years ago.
If those who proceed like the speed of light, gravity strength, or even the mass of electron Different way back if, then we should see a bad shift in appearance of astronomical items. In other words, they must differ more than they do in a universe where often the frequent.
Closer to home, physicists are focused vibrations to atoms, As used in atomic clocksto seek for deviations from pure maintenance. However, yet we do not see any signs of anything other than pure equality. And it is incredible to be accurate measurement. For most of those who are constantly, we refer to their constancy to a 1-part-billion changes in one year.
We cannot be 100% prove that those who are always frequent. That is because there is always uncertainty in our measurements, so often there are places for some possible variation, even if it is less small.
But for now, the basic regular routines appear to be consistent, and we do not know why they have values they do. We strongly believe that the story discovery of physics is no longer and more do not know the mysteries of the universe. But for now, we have to live with basic frequenters as it is as: raw numbers explaining explanation.
