Familiar PisOr months now, music stories, literature, product design, visual arts and more alarms about the British government plan to destroy copyright law. The fight kicked when the government launched a consultation to regulate artificial intelligence to this own “preferred” result: Authorizing AI companies stole copyright work by default unless owners of that work “choose”. But choose not to be unable to have no AI transparency. The plan A charter for theft, because creative ideas have no idea who depends, when and from whom.
When the government touches a preferred result that defines the moral behavior of your work and income, you can be angry. As Elton John said last week: “The government has no right to do this to my songs. They have no right to do this to any one’s songs, or any other person.” He is just a voice among thousands of British workers crying evil.
My companions and I from all parts of the Lord’s house work where the government refuses, increases emergency transparency step by law – the Data (Use and Access) Bill – that’s the passage of parliament. We will allow our repeated copyright law to implement: Copyright owners understand when, where and through his work stolen to train AI. The logic that is that if a AI company needs to reveal the evidence of theft, it does not steal the first place. These steps, voted for the constant addition of gentlemen from all parties – and great grandparents from own government backbokches – is voted By a government that uses important, when hesitating, most.
But the resistance of gentlemen finally brought the Secretary of State for technology, Peter Kyle, in the shipping box on Thursday. Here, he Greatly admitted That “many content is already used and maintained by AI models, usually from other territories and under the current law” – at the current extraction of gentlemen prevents. He talked about his love for Kate Bush, one of over 400 people, with Paul McCartney and Ian McKelelen, who signed a letter by the Prime Minister who asks for a policy change. But his policy steadily remains unchanged. No transparency, no timeline and no help for creative.
Once again, this week, the government never gets this right. To support one of our largest industry sectors, which gives 2.4m jobs and contributed to £ 126bn And a full happiness in four UK countries. Not a MP from any part has returned to the government. On the contrary, Kyle is subject to a barrage of interventions expressing an emergency he fails to deal with. As an MP said later: “One of our greatest industry sectors is in the fire and ministers with a picnic in the lawns of arsonists.”
With its quantity, the government can win the victory on any given bill. But a victory for the government is a disaster for creative and native AI industries in Britain (which, in fact, critical of the government’s way for the way the US gamers are in favor of the way.
British creative industries make up our history, they hold our shared truth and tell our national story. A country that gives its capacity to say its own story is a quick place. But the fight has not yet come – data (use and access) Bill returns to gentlemen on 2 June.
