A decade ago, astronomers learned only 62 Konon around Saturn. TODAY the targeted planet boasts a shocking 274 official satellite. That is more than any world of solar system – and greater for most people to watch. Edome Edton Ashton has no exception, though he helped discover 192 of them – he THINK That’s total, however, after stopping doing some mental mathematics.
Ashton is now a postdoctoral partner at the Sigica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics in Taiwan. He fell down in the months of Saturn in 2018, if his additional academic advisor suggested the project for his Ph.D. at the University of British Columbia. This is a productive search. Most recent, in March, Ashton and his colleagues notify a Batch of 128 newfound saturnian satellites.
American American Talking to Ashton about science learned so much little month – most of their kilometers using many data gathered in Hawaii Telescope (CFHT), located in Hawaii.
In support of science journalism
If you enjoy this article, think about supporting our winning journalism in Subscribe. By purchasing a subscription you helped to ensure the future of influential stories about the discoveries and ideas that make our world today.
(An edited transcript of interview follows.)
How did you find these months?
To find the months, we use a technique known to shift and rotate. We took 44 consecutive images of the same sky patch in a three-hour period because, at that time of time, months moved related to Saturn stars. If we simply applaud images normal, then the moon is seen as a streak of images, and melt the moon signal.
So what we do is: We exchange images related to each other in many different rates near Saturn, and then we are rude between different transit rates. If the shift rate is less than the month rate, then it can be a little recovery. As you approach the moon rate, then it slowly combines a dot. And then, as you are faster than the rate of the month, it will grow again. So mainly, we look at the images and then quickly get rid of different rates, and you can see the moon coors.
That one night. But just looking at something moving at a rate like Saturn close to Saturn doesn’t guarantee it’s a month. It is likely that the item is one month, but it does not confirm. So what do we need to do is keep track of things to show that they are in orbit around the planet. To do that, we repeat the (transit and stack) process for several months over many months and years.
Why did it happen today? Do you need new ways and observatory to do this work?
The technique and the technology is already in a while – the same technique is used to find the months of Neptune and Uranus. But the sky area around the planets where the months can have a little bit, so there is no small amount of time to find data. One of the reasons why it didn’t work for Saturn because it was very wasteful time.
Why do other planets have less space where months can be than Saturn?
Those planets are less widespread, so the strong orbit that can be in months are small.
I wonder if this method works for other planets, and clearly the answer is yes. But do you think there are other months not yet found around Saturn or other planets with a procedure?
We found the Saturn moon candidates that we could not track long enough to confirm them. So when you turn this technique, you’ll find many months around Saturn, but it’s a case of reduction in return. If you use a larger telescope (than CFHT), when you see the fainter moon, so can you find more.
Currently, if you use the same method for JupiterYou will find fainter moon. The problem is: The amount of the sky is that the jupiter months can occupy much more than (the volume of the sky that can be broke in months of) saturning for jupiter. And Jupiter is more bright than Saturn and other planets, so there are many scattered lights that make it difficult to see months.
So harder to find satellites around the jupiter, and as you mentioned, some groups have already made this work for Uranus and Neptune. Does it mean that we are different from “Max” in the months until you have better observations?
Yes, you may need to wait until better technology comes.
Is there something built or planned now that can be “better technology”?
Now there are telescopes to see deep (than cfht), such as James Webb Space Telescope (Jwst). The problem is: The jwst’s view is too small, so you need to do some observations to cover the required area. But there is a telescope set to launch well soon, the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescopewith a large field of view. So this is a good telescope to use for hunting more than months.
What do we know about new months?
You can only get moons orbits and approximate sizes. But if you look at the distribution In orbits, you will understand the system history more. The months of the clumped together in orbital space are the most consequence of collisions, so you can see what is from the same parent’s thing.
Did a lot of months around unusual?
What is unusual as many as many. It appears that the planets have more or less similar numbers in larger months. But if you get down to the little ones we know, Saturn seems to shoot in terms of numbers. So pretty interesting. It can only be because there is a recent collision within the Saturnian system that produces several fragments.
Do you like them all? Do you need to name them all?
I think I’m not have to. Some of the new months, they are involved in Observations by different groups from over 10 years ago. It seems 20 to 30 of them. For others, we got the perfect credit to discover, which, in my mind, mean we can get the right to nam them. But they cannot be called reasonable; First, they just give a number if they have a high precision orbit, and I’m not sure when it will be carried.
Do you have many observations of the monthly analysis hunting?
No, I have a little break from months! I have other projects to work, related to Trans-Neptunian years. They are so far away. They are hard to see. there some mysteries about them at the moment. It is interesting to understand their structure and how it is relevant to the planet formation.
