Spiders use a range of predator lines, including strong venoms, complex strategies of hunting and powerful energy size in the body to get the victim. This variation, along with the connective nature of Venom Potency, makes spiders a very good group to study evolutionary trade-off. However, the methods of comparisons confusing history by using the atypical prey models to measure Venom skills. Here, we explain confusing issues by including the parallel to the phylogenetic between the food of a spider and the species used in measuring thread skills. Using a phylogenetic comparison of analysis of 75 spider spiders to try how dieting, silver used to catch the prey and silver body50), we show that spider venoms are usually stronger against models that are closely related to their natural victim, showing clear prey. Despite predictions, we have no trade-off trade size, using silk and venom recovery. We know that Venom’s scales provide sublined size, showing 0.75 allometric scaling predicted by metabolic theory, which venbasically theory of loved ones. Our method shows how contemporary computation methods can be used in historical venom measures to test evolutionary standards.
Lyon Keith, Dagon Kevin 2025spider Venom Potency showed phylogenetic prey specific herd but not trade-off with body size or use of the victim’s silk. Lett.2120250133 http://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2025.0133
