Column: the ‘one, big, beautiful bill’ is a big, bad difference

Column: the ‘one, big, beautiful bill’ is a big, bad difference

“A big beautiful bill” is a big, bad mess.

We have found false advertising on the naming laws before – the 2022 drinking of inflicting the democratic’s crainction act jumps in mind. However there is no tax abuse while Republican Tax and President Trump expends, the care of the aficionado itself, pushes an enthusiastic path to Congress.

Trump appeals to many Americans who always hold his penchant for “saying this It’s like this. “But he did the opposite by labeling as” a big beautiful bill “attached to all tax crashes and, yes, Medicaid cuts down The United States credit score for the first time for more than 100 years. That is likely to mean higher interest costs for further borrowing in the country ahead.

And yet, another instance of gaslighting where Trump and his party are better, the White House leaders and House Republican swept The rebuke of their bill. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessense said it runs economic growth – the old, discriminated “tax cuts will pay for their own” argument. Mike Mike Mike Johnson confirms that Moody’s downfall only proves urgent need to pass the large, beautiful bill with “historic cuts of” historic spending. “Proving that Johnson did not read Moody’s reasoning, explaining that the cost of cuts exceeded tax cuts, thus lowered tax revenues, so reduced the income of additional debt.

The Republican Party, postures as a conservative health of both parties despite decades of evidence, adds $ 4 trillion in the next 10 years if the law becomes law, according to Moody’s. Other nonpartisan analysis – including from Congress Budget OfficeTHE Committee for a responsible federal budget and the Penn Wharton’s budget model At the University of Pennsylvania, the same project further debt to $ 3-trillion-plus in the $ 5-trillion range, more if the tax cuts and Republicans want.

No Surprise: Trump, after all, place a record for the most debt in a presidential term: $ 8.4 trillion During the Trump 1.0, almost twice what came under his successor, President Biden. Most of the first term red red red ink from his 2017 tax cuts and spending, which sets Covid-19 pandemic and costly government response.

“This bill does not add to the disability,” White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has been placed by journalists on Monday, also revealed to say the usual prevaricating president.

“That’s a joke,” Republican Rep. Thomas massie in Kentucky replied.

Worst, it’s a lie.

And no wonder here, but Trump’s tariffs – another economy that he has expressed “WONDERFUL“- Aren’t paying for this bill despite his claims. Yet the president repeated that falsehood on Tuesday (along with others), when he visited the capitol to strong-arms Republican dissidents, including masses IS reported called for massie not to decrease; Kentuckian remains opposed.)

“The economy is good, the stock market is higher today than when I arrived at the office. And we got hundreds of billions of dollars in cash,” Trump told Capitol reporters. Every point is a lie.

. As late last week that prices have to rise, Trump post that it should be “‘eat the tariffs.’ “He added:” I will look, and so are your customers !!! “This is after a Walmart Exec” the size of this increase is more than any dealer can absorb. “)

While the Budget Bill Shift details as Republican leaders with disks, here is the bad overall outline, according to Penn Wharton:

Expectation and to expand The 2017 Trump Tax cut, which is if this year, spends almost $ 4.5 trillion for more than 10 years, $ 5.8 trillion is permanent. .

Spending over 10 years, most of Medicaid as well as Obamaid, food stamps and cleaning programs, to trillion. That’s the offs a bit like a quarter of the Trump tax cuts and added spending.

Also, the bill is not acceptable. Tax cuts will ignore the favor of corporations and rich Americans. Instead, cutting their spending cuts, mostly – and some people in the middle income benefited from federal and nutritional health programs. Medicaid changes, including a job requirement (92% of recipients Under 65 jobs full or part-time, according to health organization of health, and Obamacare leaves up to 14 million people with no health insurance.

Penn Wharton It is found that people with household income less than $ 51,000, for example, see their finish taxes, and the top 0.1% of dollar books over the next 10 years. More than time, Penn Wharton is expected, “all future homes are worse” to give long-term debt effect and a net safety.

“Don’t go to Medicaid,” Trump told The Republicans of the Capitol, according to many reports. How to cynical, he is given forcing them to vote for a bill to do that.

We all remember an acronym popular these days: External.

@jackiekcalmes

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *