Column: History only should cause reporters to doubt about Biden’s health

Column: History only should cause reporters to doubt about Biden’s health

Hundreds of thousands of pictures were taken by Franklin Delano Roosevelt. And however, there are four known pictures of him in a wheelchair. It’s deliberately. The FDR hides his disability from polio, even from his mother. He ordered the secret service to destroy him images in a wheelchair. His doctor, recommended by the doctor who has helped maintain the worst of President Wilson’s plague hidden from public view, is SELECTIONS for similar discretion.

Roosevelt has yet to signal with press corps in the so-called Hugh Gallagher, his book of the same name, “beautiful fRDr.” It is easy to reason with the decision. Amongst the great depression and second world war, journalists feel that they need to be with the effort to describe the President as physical to work.

These are the most important examples of this type of obfuscation. But there are other. Grover Cleveland has a tumor taken what the White House claims a “fishing trip.” The severity of the heart attack at Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1955 was eliminated to prevent his reelection. Jfk suffered from the disease of Addison and “treated” by his personal physician “Jacobson, aka Syvegood, who gave him shotsamine and methamphetamine. No idea the public is up to a The New York Times report in 1972.

In other words, the controversy of Joe Biden’s weakness – and now his righteous stage 4 prostate cancer – it is not new as it seems.

That controversy, re-ignited by the publication of “Original Sin: President Biden’s Decline, its cover-up, and his disastrous choice to run again,” by Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson, was dominating the political conversation until the Biden family released news of his cancer. According to Tapper (an anchor to CNN, where I am a contributing) and Thompson (a journalist for axios, biden, biden, as they often do, from a severe party to hold Donald Trump from teasing In the White House, in a desire through his closest people to remain in power.

As a high level of Adle-SEFT tells the authors, “he only has to win, and then he will disappear for four years – he must show proof of life at a time.”

Doubts that cancer’s revelation is an extension of Team Biden’s desire to control the illound to his health is hard to avoid. David Axelrod, a democratic strategist and power broker who is very vocal about political problems presented by the age of biden, there is a class that ANSWERS The biden team probably looks forward. “Those conversations (part of Biden’s weakness and the effort to hide it) will happen, but they should be more muted and spending for today as he is struggling with it.”

It is difficult to obtain the spirit of Axelrod’s kindness. There is no call for madness Others went out in response to an 82-year-old diagnosis of husband cancer. But doubt is considered to everyone, even if it comes from parties. As many doctors – including oncologist Zeke EmmanuelA former Biden Administric Medical Advisor – noticed, prostate cancer very slowly, and is very strange that a Tom-Term Profile can take a lot of medical exams that haven’t been able to get it before. Whatever the truth, history – both bid and that of presidency – makes begging poor questions legitimately.

One of the clear and many mentioned lessons from this chapter is that news news should indulge in the skepticism or the ideological dislike. For many Republicans, the lack of lack of health reporters and acuity can be explained fully to a part of the reporters, fearing a Restoration of Trump, hiding the truth.

However, less mentioned, that is the part that can be a useful tool to expose the truth. Axelrod did not push biden removal from 2024 tickets because he was a Republican. She is a partisan democrat found to say the truth for the moments of the party to win.

Similarly, the answer is correct in the “original sin” and the revelations are not one in shock but in “we have told you.” Biden’s weakness felt suits their partisan tops, but that doesn’t mean it’s not true. Many of the media have forgotten that partisanship is usually one of the things that can motivate people to give voice of bad truths.

@Jonahdispatch

Insights

La Times Insights Gives AI-Ginaleans analysis of Venters in Voices to offer all points in view. Views cannot be found in any news articles.

view
This article usually prompts a center point of view. Learn more about this analysis of AI analysis
Views

The following content becomes AI run by confusion. Los Angeles editorial staff do not create or edit content.

Ideas stated in the piece

  • The article argued that the preface to history, like the secret of Franklin D. Roosevelt in his paralysis induced by polio, showed a long standing standard of Health Health Obfuscation. FDR avoids the use of the public in wheelchairs, depends on the shaped appearances, and collaborates with the press to hide his disability(1)(4)(5).
  • Following the media to the limits of masking leaders highlighted during FDR, where reporters agreed that he would not have his wheerating image of the strength of the world as the great depression and war of the world(4)(5).
  • The writer contends to that part, while often criticized for bias, can also expose facts. Democratic democratic strategic strategic strategic strategic Axelrrod is part of biden fitness, despite ideological alignment, means how political motives are aligned.

Different views of the subject

  • History context suggests that the wise use of FDR in a monitored wheelchair – a change of chairchen in the kitchen – and the confidence of aides for strengthening the leadership of the laning, not only tricks(2)(3). Press compliance may result from a belief that maintaining the strength of the National Emcationcies period above the entire transparency(4).
  • Medical time experts emphasize that polio safety should be strong health, failed by FDR to lower his or her condition. This frame allows him to describe himself more than his paralysis, complicated modern comparisons of other leaders’ health controversy(1)(4).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *