In the editor: The argument of Trump administration against national judicial commands with respect to the issue of birthright in birth is, best, tissue thin (“Truths who doubt the Trump plan to prevent birthrights of birth but also spoils blocking it,” May 15).
The administration idea is that all judicial push-backs (yes, plural) in the Trumpian Citizens before the federal translations, which are revealed by the federal judges, referred to the words of the 14th change in the US Constitution. That 14th language language is clearly induced not only a citizenship in the state of birth, but also a citizen citizen citizen. Through those words, any commands released with the test of writing President Trump’s writing in the 14th change should bring in the entire country.
This most recent trump appeal to the US Supreme Court is nothing but an obvious non-religious dodge and betray his oath of office to see that the laws are faithful.
David L. Clark, Saticoy, Calif.
..
In the editor: Thomas jefferson wrote on James Madison from Paris on March 15, 1789, when delegates at the Constitutional Convention Debated Inclusion of a Bill of Rights: “In the arguments in favor of a declaration of rights, you omat one which has great weight with me, the legal check which it puts into the hands of the Judiciary. ” The Supreme Court can blanket the judiciary as a coequal branch of government.
The judiciary helped advance the liberty of refusal to Congress. The lower court developed in Liberty in the United States vs Wong Kim Ark (1898) by supporting the Citizenship Clause of the 14th change. They reigned in this passage of Proposition in California 14 in 1964, to allow landowners and traders to sell a different discementar of 14th change. The lower court started liberty for interracial coolles to live as a husband and wife to love Virginia (1967).
I hope future elections prevent the legal examination of the judiciary against the mob and monarchical rule as a threat to liberty.
Keith Serminger, Merced, Calif.
..
In the editor: Courtes in the Supreme Court must speak Trump administration that cannot change the Constitution through executive order. Constitutional amendment is a legislative function that requires many steps. President Trump clearly wants to avoid the upper process because he considered himself as ruler in the United States. That itself violates the constitution, because there are no kings in this country.
Glenn Shockley, Winnetka
